On 12-09-10 at 04:37pm, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 03:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >My point is that setting DKIMproxy to 5 and Postfix to 10 is wrong:
> I'm sorry, but it doesn't make sense. The documentation in the
> README.Debian tells to do this:
> smtp inet n - n
On 09/10/2012 03:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
My point is not that 10 is better than 5.
My point is that setting DKIMproxy to 5 and Postfix to 10 is wrong: it
works but quite inefficiently - if you don't care about queues being
handled correct then why care about those numbers at all?
On a re
On 12-09-10 at 02:01pm, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> During a discussion on upstream mailing list, I remember that one
> person did some tests to check what was the optimum value for maxproc.
> If I remember well, he told that 5 was the ideal value for a single
> core CPU.
>
> So I wonder: how many
Hi Jonas,
After giving it a day, and thinking a bit more about your bug entry, I
have some more to add.
During a discussion on upstream mailing list, I remember that one person
did some tests to check what was the optimum value for maxproc. If I
remember well, he told that 5 was the ideal va
4 matches
Mail list logo
