Bug#686038: RFS: fpc/2.6.0-7

2012-12-22 Thread Abou Al Montacir
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 19:50 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Hi, > > Le 21/12/2012 19:12, Abou Al Montacir a écrit : > > On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 16:59 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > >> Le 21/12/2012 15:13, Paul Gevers a écrit : > >> > >>> Reading through bug 684437 [1] I think you misunderstood the last r

Bug#686038: RFS: fpc/2.6.0-7

2012-12-21 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 21/12/2012 19:12, Abou Al Montacir a écrit : > On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 16:59 -0400, David Prévot wrote: >> Le 21/12/2012 15:13, Paul Gevers a écrit : >> >>> Reading through bug 684437 [1] I think you misunderstood the last remark >>> by David P

Bug#686038: RFS: fpc/2.6.0-7

2012-12-21 Thread Abou Al Montacir
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 16:59 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Hi Abou, Paul, > > Le 21/12/2012 15:13, Paul Gevers a écrit : > > > Reading through bug 684437 [1] I think you misunderstood the last remark > > by David Prévot, where he proposed to create a 2.6.0-7 with all the > > translations, but creat

Bug#686038: RFS: fpc/2.6.0-7

2012-12-21 Thread David Prévot
Hi Abou, Paul, Le 21/12/2012 15:13, Paul Gevers a écrit : > Reading through bug 684437 [1] I think you misunderstood the last remark > by David Prévot, where he proposed to create a 2.6.0-7 with all the > translations, but creating a debdiff without the translations. Confirmed (and ACK about all