Hi Benjamin,
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 02:25:46AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
> The current changes in our git repository fix two bugs and I like to get
> these fixes into wheezy. The new script origtargz was also added and I
> dunno if this scripts prevents us from getting the fixes into wheezy
Am Sonntag, den 26.08.2012, 14:29 -0400 schrieb James McCoy:
> Thanks to both of you for working on this functionality. The patches so
> far look good.
>
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 03:30:44PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I attached another Git formated patch and repeat my question whether
> > i
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:29:37PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> Thanks to both of you for working on this functionality. The patches so
> far look good.
>
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 03:30:44PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I attached another Git formated patch and repeat my question whether
Hi James,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:29:37PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
>
> We can just as easily pull from another git repository
> (e.g., git.debian.org/users/tille/devscripts.git) when we're ready to
> merge the patches.
OK, I'll consider this.
> I'd really rather not have features being adde
Thanks to both of you for working on this functionality. The patches so
far look good.
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 03:30:44PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I attached another Git formated patch and repeat my question whether
> it might make sense to directly commit to the devscripts repository.
We c
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:30:44 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I reverted one single line in your patch because this would break one of
> my test cases namely
>
>Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/saint/trunk/
>
> and does not fit my intention. You tried to check whether up
Hi Gregor,
I reverted one single line in your patch because this would break one of
my test cases namely
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/saint/trunk/
and does not fit my intention. You tried to check whether upstream might
contain a dir /^$pkg\w*$newversion$excludesuf
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 02:59:33PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > The attached patch does the following:
>
> Attached are some patches based on devscipts+git plus your original
> patch.
I forgot to mention that my patch was also based on devscripts git and I
wonder whether somebody from the de
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:38:13 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> in a (bit longish) thread on debian-devel@l.d.o[1] there was some
> discussion about enabling uscan to remove files from upstream archives
> according to some information given in some control file. There was no
> real consensus about wha
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:08:54PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 04:38:13PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> >
> > 1. If (and only if) the debian/copyright file is
> >
> > Format:
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
>
> I think th
Le Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 04:38:13PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> 1. If (and only if) the debian/copyright file is
>
> Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Hi Andreas,
I think that this is too strict. For instance, if the format specification is
u
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.69+squeeze2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
in a (bit longish) thread on debian-devel@l.d.o[1] there was some
discussion about enabling uscan to remove files from upstream archives
according to some information given in some control file. There was no
real co
12 matches
Mail list logo
