On Mi, Aug 15, 2012 at 00:16:27 (CEST), Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
> On 8/14/12 10:03 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> I see two options here: a) we update the existing package to the new
>> amttool-tng tarball b) we package amttool-tng in addition to the
>> existing amtterm package Option b) would al
On 8/14/12 10:03 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I see two options here: a) we update the existing package to the new
amttool-tng tarball b) we package amttool-tng in addition to the
existing amtterm package Option b) would allow users to choose between
the two tools. However, according to its home
On Mo, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:53:58 (CEST), Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
> Package: amtterm
> Version: 1.3-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The amtterm package would greatly benefit from
> including the amttool-tng utility - or if it could
> be packaged separately, it might be a better option.
>
> amttool-tng i
Package: amtterm
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: wishlist
The amtterm package would greatly benefit from
including the amttool-tng utility - or if it could
be packaged separately, it might be a better option.
amttool-tng is a fork of the original amttool, and
supports many more AMT commands and info.
S
4 matches
Mail list logo
