Bug#684593: Not fixed after all

2013-09-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 20:53:19 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 13:02:05 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > Seems I was a bit confused. The meat of the patch is still necessary > > for libdrm2 to work on kfreebsd (as seen on the upstream bug which is >

Bug#684593: Not fixed after all

2013-09-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 13:02:05 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > Hi all! > > Seems I was a bit confused. The meat of the patch is still necessary > for libdrm2 to work on kfreebsd (as seen on the upstream bug which is > still open as well). All "we" need is [0] from that bug though. Anyone > fa

Bug#684593: Not fixed after all

2013-09-19 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi all! Seems I was a bit confused. The meat of the patch is still necessary for libdrm2 to work on kfreebsd (as seen on the upstream bug which is still open as well). All "we" need is [0] from that bug though. Anyone familiar with upstream an idea on how this bug can be fixed there? The bugrepo