On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 03:46:51PM +0200, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> found 684528 0.152-1+b1
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> Sorry, I've just tried to reproduce the bug and I got a FTBS in
> testing, but not with the unstable version.
>
> Should we ask the release team to allow the transition to testing
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 15:46 +0200, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Sorry, I've just tried to reproduce the bug and I got a FTBS in
> testing, but not with the unstable version.
Which architecture did you test the build on?
With a newly updated amd64 unstable pbuilder chroot:
$ pdebuild --buildresult
found 684528 0.152-1+b1
thanks
Hello,
Sorry, I've just tried to reproduce the bug and I got a FTBS in
testing, but not with the unstable version.
Should we ask the release team to allow the transition to testing?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 01:34:39PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> Package: elfutils
> Version: 0.153-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu quantal ubuntu-patch
>
>
> Due to a slight thinko (I assume), your build-arch/build-indep split
> l
Package: elfutils
Version: 0.153-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu quantal ubuntu-patch
Due to a slight thinko (I assume), your build-arch/build-indep split
leads elfutils to FTBFS with the new dpkg-buildpackage, which calls
build-arch for
5 matches
Mail list logo
