On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Lior Kaplan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Ariel wrote:
But why drop them? They work perfectly. Is there any harm in leaving them
there?
As I said, lack of use. No harm in keeping them, just work due to PHP
related chanes (at that time it was work on PHP 5.4)
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Ariel wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Lior Kaplan wrote:
>
> The php binding were dropped, as in we don't build and provide them any
>> more. This is due to lack of use (judging by the popcon statistics).
>>
>
> But why drop them? They work perfectly. Is there any
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Lior Kaplan wrote:
The php binding were dropped, as in we don't build and provide them any
more. This is due to lack of use (judging by the popcon statistics).
But why drop them? They work perfectly. Is there any harm in leaving them
there?
And I don't understand how yo
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Ariel wrote:
> I noticed the changelog said you removed libhdate-php - did you intend to
> replace it with php-libhdate or was it supposed to be included in the core
> libhdate1 package?
>
The php binding were dropped, as in we don't build and provide them any
mo
4 matches
Mail list logo
