Hi,
This package still needs to be uploaded to Wheezy. GDM3 doesn't start
now with the current policy in Wheezy. Please upload 2:2.20110726-10 to
Wheezy, thanks!
Kind regards,
Kees
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sep 5, 2012, at 5:11, deb...@mikapflueger.de wrote:
> Hi Ron
> Are you absolutely sure the context for gdm3 is correct at the machine where
> it doesn't work? You wrote that you relabeled and rebooted and that would
> restore the (wrong) context. Unfortunately (I'm not sure if this is a bug
Hi Ron,
Am 05.09.2012 02:32, schrieb Ron Murray:
I did some work on the remaining machine today. First I enabled
debugging on the gdm3 daemon, set up an strace, and started gdm. As
before, gdm3 respawned multiple times in short order before I stopped
it.
Only serious thing I could find was thi
Package: selinux-policy-default
Version: 2:2.20110726-9
Followup-For: Bug #683756
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I did some work on the remaining machine today. First I enabled
debugging on the gdm3 daemon, set up an strace, and started gdm. As
before, gdm3 respawned multiple
On 08/29/12 06:27, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Alright, I got it.
>
> /usr/sbin/gdm3 is not labeled with the right context.
>
> On my machine here it's labeled:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root system_u:object_r:xdm_exec_t:SystemLow 160296 jun 25
> 20:29 /usr/sbin/gdm3
>
> And by default in
Le 29 Aug 2012 22:42:19 +0200,
"Andreas Kuckartz" a écrit :
> Mika Pflüger:
> > I just couldn't imagine the label having any influence on the
> > functionality in permissive mode. Well, I still don't really
> > understand, but it works. (-:
>
> I also would really like to understand how the la
Mika Pflüger:
> I just couldn't imagine the label having any influence on the
> functionality in permissive mode. Well, I still don't really
> understand, but it works. (-:
I also would really like to understand how the label could break gdm
in permissive mode.
I do not like unexplained "this c
Hi,
Am Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:23:29 +0200
schrieb Laurent Bigonville :
> Le Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:45:02 +0530,
> piruthiviraj natarajan a écrit :
>
> > You want us to change the type "bin_t" into what?
> > I assumed that you want to relabel the type and I tried relabelling
> > #chcon -t xdm_exec_t /
Le Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:45:02 +0530,
piruthiviraj natarajan a écrit :
> You want us to change the type "bin_t" into what?
> I assumed that you want to relabel the type and I tried relabelling
> #chcon -t xdm_exec_t /usr/sbin/gdm3
>
> but it didn't work. Still stuck with a black screen. I had to
You want us to change the type "bin_t" into what?
I assumed that you want to relabel the type and I tried relabelling
#chcon -t xdm_exec_t /usr/sbin/gdm3
but it didn't work. Still stuck with a black screen. I had to disable the
selinux at boot to login to X.
Now I am at
#ls -Z /usr/sbin/gdm3
syst
Hello,
Alright, I got it.
/usr/sbin/gdm3 is not labeled with the right context.
On my machine here it's labeled:
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root system_u:object_r:xdm_exec_t:SystemLow 160296 jun 25
20:29 /usr/sbin/gdm3
And by default in wheezy it's labeled as bin_t.
Could you please confirm that cha
On 08/28/12 13:00, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you please check if you have the selinux-policy-default package
> installed?
>
> Also, what is the "semanage login -l" command giving you?
>
> Cheers
>
> Laurent Bigonville
selinux-policy-default package is installed.
"semanage login -l
Hi,
Am Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:00:46 +0200
schrieb Laurent Bigonville :
> Could you please check if you have the selinux-policy-default package
> installed?
yes, it is recommended by selinux-basics, thus I have it installed.
>
> Also, what is the "semanage login -l" command giving you?
On my real
I have the selinux-policy-default package installed.
root@debian:~# semanage login -l
Login NameSELinux User MLS/MCS
Range
__default__ unconfined_u systemLow-systemHigh
root unconfined_u systemLow-systemH
Hi,
Could you please check if you have the selinux-policy-default package
installed?
Also, what is the "semanage login -l" command giving you?
Cheers
Laurent Bigonville
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
Hi,
I have this problem, too. Also, I was able to reproduce it in a fresh
install in a virtual machine:
1. Install debian wheezy with d-i current, select graphical desktop
task.
2. Install selinux-basics
3. run selinux-activate
4. reboot
5. watch gdm3 break.
If I then use "service gdm3 stop" to k
The enforcing mode of selinux breaks the gdm3 too.
On 08/14/12 05:03, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> I'm running selinux in permissive mode and using GDM3 as DM and I've no
> problem with it.
>
> Could you look in /etc/pam.d/ and see and see what are call to
> pam_selinux module in the gdm3 related services?
>
> Also what is the version of gdm3 packag
tag 683756 + moreinfo
thanks
Le Mon, 13 Aug 2012 22:33:14 -0400,
Ron Murray a écrit :
> Running gdm3 in debug mode, I get this in the gdm slave log:
>
> -
> gdm-welcome][4275]: DEBUG(+): GdmSessionWorker: received pam message
> of type 2 with payload 'Would you like to
Package: selinux-policy-default
Version: 2:2.20110726-9
Followup-For: Bug #683756
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Running gdm3 in debug mode, I get this in the gdm slave log:
-
gdm-welcome][4275]: DEBUG(+): GdmSessionWorker: received pam message of type 2
Package: selinux-policy-default
Version: 2:2.20110726-9
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Since the last selinux update (around July 6), running selinux in
permissive mode stops gdm3 and X from working for me (haven't tried
enforced mode).
Bootup proceeds normally un
21 matches
Mail list logo
