Bug#683445: One more try

2012-11-12 Thread Anton Gladky
Ok, done. Anton 2012/11/12 intrigeri > > Hi, > > Anton Gladky wrote (11 Nov 2012 22:00:06 GMT) : > > So, probably, backports are much better alternative for gmsh in > > this case. > > You may want to close this bug, then. > > Cheers! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@list

Bug#683445: One more try

2012-11-12 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Anton Gladky wrote (11 Nov 2012 22:00:06 GMT) : > So, probably, backports are much better alternative for gmsh in > this case. You may want to close this bug, then. Cheers! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Bug#683445: One more try

2012-11-11 Thread Anton Gladky
Hello, thanks for the respond. The difference between these 2 version is definitely larger, than can be allowed by release-team. So, probably, backports are much better alternative for gmsh in this case. Cheers, Anton

Bug#683445: One more try

2012-11-10 Thread intrigeri
Hi Anton, Anton Gladky wrote (21 Sep 2012 19:57:04 GMT) : > Dear release team, (Disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team.) > the license problem of GMSH is resolved [1], the upstream > kindly agreed to add a license exception. > Please, consider adding this package (version 2.6.1.dfsg-4 in

Bug#683445: One more try

2012-09-21 Thread Anton Gladky
Dear release team, the license problem of GMSH is resolved [1], the upstream kindly agreed to add a license exception. Please, consider adding this package (version 2.6.1.dfsg-4 in unstable) into Wheezy. I understand, that is, probably, too late for adding "new" packages, but it would be frustrat