Hi,
On 09/09/2019 12:56, Gedalya wrote:
On 9/9/19 3:14 AM, Sam Kuper wrote:
Please could you comment on whether `pcre2test` meets your needs,
such that Debian Developers[1] need not expend effort packaging
`pcretest`?
It's worth noting that pcre2test doesn't use the same library and is
not
On 9/9/19 3:14 AM, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On 29 Apr 2013, Richard James Salts wrote[0]:
>> [..] pcretest was a handy utility. It would be good if the program
>> could instead be included with the pcregrep package in pcre-utils
>> package or the like.
> On 31 Jul 2012, Gedalya wrote:
>> As per #61666
On 29 Apr 2013, Richard James Salts wrote[0]:
> [..] pcretest was a handy utility. It would be good if the program
> could instead be included with the pcregrep package in pcre-utils
> package or the like.
On 31 Jul 2012, Gedalya wrote:
> As per #616660, pcretest is no longer distributed in any
I too have found pcretest useful - both for my own testing of REs and more
importantly as a valuable tool when teaching REs.
Please package pcretest, either in its own binary or in a package like
prce-utils.
Thanks,
Neale.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
4 matches
Mail list logo
