Bug#682401: dbmmanage: please use Digest::SHA instead of Digest::SHA1

tags 682401 + pending thanks Hi, On 22.07.2012 22:22, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > AFAICS, dbmmanage has not seen a single code commit upstream since the > C variant, htdbm, has been introduced in 2001. Maybe we should get rid > of dbmmanage in the 2.4 packages. But unbreaking it for wheezy by > us

Bug#682401: dbmmanage: please use Digest::SHA instead of Digest::SHA1

Hi, On 22.07.2012 22:22, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > AFAICS, dbmmanage has not seen a single code commit upstream since the > C variant, htdbm, has been introduced in 2001. Maybe we should get rid > of dbmmanage in the 2.4 packages. But unbreaking it for wheezy by > using Digest::SHA instead of Dig

Bug#682401: dbmmanage: please use Digest::SHA instead of Digest::SHA1

On Sunday 22 July 2012, Arno Töll wrote: > Evidently not too many people are using dbmmanage, even less with > SHA1 encryption since it is not the default option but nobody > noticed so far. Nonetheless the removal of Digest::SHA1 breaks the > application in a fatal way when SHA-1 encryption is exp

Bug#682401: dbmmanage: please use Digest::SHA instead of Digest::SHA1

severity 682401 serious thanks Hi, Evidently not too many people are using dbmmanage, even less with SHA1 encryption since it is not the default option but nobody noticed so far. Nonetheless the removal of Digest::SHA1 breaks the application in a fatal way when SHA-1 encryption is explicitly desi

Bug#682401: dbmmanage: please use Digest::SHA instead of Digest::SHA1

Package: apache2-utils Version: 2.2.22-9 Severity: normal dbmmanage uses Digest::SHA1 which was removed from Debian some time ago[1]. Please use Digest::SHA instead which is part of the core modules included with the perl interpreter since 5.10. [1] In most cas