On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:30:31PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-02-28 at 15:29 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Kurt Roeckx, on Thu 19 Jul 2012 18:54:01 +0200, wrote:
> > > I'm also happy with a patch that does the right thin on hurd that
> > > doesn't use /proc/$pid/maps.
> >
> > T
Mark Wielaard, on Wed 02 Mar 2016 15:30:31 +0100, wrote:
> I/upstream doesn't have access to non-GNU/Linux setups
> though. So we would need a bit of help testing such things.
Not a problem for us :)
Samuel
On Sun, 2016-02-28 at 15:29 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx, on Thu 19 Jul 2012 18:54:01 +0200, wrote:
> > I'm also happy with a patch that does the right thin on hurd that
> > doesn't use /proc/$pid/maps.
>
> The maps file was added, it however for now lacks the paths.
>
> Perhaps we
Hello,
Kurt Roeckx, on Sat 03 Mar 2012 22:10:11 +0100, wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:12:13PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > The current version of elfutils FTBFS on several architectures:
> > hurd-i386
>
> Yes, nothing new. It should never have built on hurd, but it
> seems some people th
4 matches
Mail list logo
