I agree with Josh's assessment. As I noted in 668239, different host
keys for different ports on the same server are clearly documented in
the OpenSSH man page. Hence, the assessment in the initial bugreport and
hostkey.patch are clearly wrong. I tested dropping hostkey.patch and
this makes paramik
I would tend to agree with your assessment of the situation. I need to
go back and evaluate it all as I wasn't the one that added the patch, it
was done by an NMU without my involvement which is why I dislike NMUs
being done on my packages as they tend to introduce more issues than solve.
Package: python-paramiko
Version: 1.7.7.1-3
Followup-For: Bug #682050
As far as I can tell, no "original issue" exists. Bug 668239 seems to
complain that paramiko distinguishes between host keys for different
ports on the same server. That's not a bug, that's a feature, and
removing it results i
Hi
Dne Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:50:38 -0400
"Jeremy T. Bouse" napsal(a):
> Well let's color me (package maintainer) surprised that an NMU wasn't
> fully tested and broke my package yet again. I'll dig into it when I've
> got time and see if upstream has worked on addressing the original issue
>
Well let's color me (package maintainer) surprised that an NMU wasn't
fully tested and broke my package yet again. I'll dig into it when I've
got time and see if upstream has worked on addressing the original issue
in the first place.
On 07/19/2012 03:25 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Package:
Package: python-paramiko
Version: 1.7.7.1-3
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
this seems to be regression caused by fixing #668239. The original code
does work for me, while new one always fails with:
ssh: Rejecting ssh-rsa host key for .cihar.com:
b655
6 matches
Mail list logo
