Bug#682010: Interoperability with speex patch

2012-08-13 Thread Chris Knadle
On Sunday, August 12, 2012 14:36:34, Ron wrote: […] > Celt was an entirely experimental codebase, each 'version' of it that > was tagged existed *only* for testing the quality of the audio that it > produced. Next to no attention was paid to the normal "release issues" > of a piece of "production"

Bug#682010: Interoperability with speex patch

2012-08-12 Thread Ron
Ok, where to begin ... I guess first off, the IRC meeting was a big help for me in getting a sense of what was already clear and what was not. I fairly deliberately didn't lurk that because I was more interested in listening to what other people were "thinking out loud" at this stage, and it was

Bug#682010: Interoperability with speex patch

2012-07-30 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Don Armstrong wrote: > One of the possible technical solutions to #682010 is the use of the > speex codex as a default. The CTTE would like to see the packages > which incorporate this solution and a table of client/server > compatibility so we can choose which solution is most

Bug#682010: Interoperability with speex patch

2012-07-30 Thread Don Armstrong
One of the possible technical solutions to #682010 is the use of the speex codex as a default. The CTTE would like to see the packages which incorporate this solution and a table of client/server compatibility so we can choose which solution is most desirable. If you (Ron) could work with Nicos to