tags 681545 pending
thanks
Hi,
along with the fix for #681546 I also changed the behavior for postinst.
It's called unconditionally now in postinst, as we disable the module in
prerm now, so that we need to cover the rollback case again.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Fr
Arno Töll writes:
> I'm finally coming back to the dh_apache issues you filed long ago.
>> I believe you should therefore just remove this conditional and run this
>> code in postinst unconditionally.
> Your explanation sounds right to me. However, we do not unconditionally
> disable the module
Hi Russ,
I'm finally coming back to the dh_apache issues you filed long ago.
> I believe you should therefore just remove this conditional and run this
> code in postinst unconditionally.
Your explanation sounds right to me. However, we do not unconditionally
disable the module either. We only
3 matches
Mail list logo
