On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 15.07.2012 10:27, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>
>> Yes, they look wrong to me. It's not actually grave as it isn't likely
>> that some package would explicitly depend on the extra variant and
>> rely on a versioned dependency, but current
Am 15.07.2012 10:27, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
Yes, they look wrong to me. It's not actually grave as it isn't likely
that some package would explicitly depend on the extra variant and
rely on a versioned dependency, but currently we would break that.
Yes, but I'm itching to remove them to fina
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 15.07.2012, 10:04 +0400 schrieb Stepan Golosunov:
>> All recent patches appear to modify changelog for 6:0.8.3-4. However,
>> 6:0.8.3-4 is already in testing.
>
> Indeed, thanks for noticing. I have fixed this up in GIT.
>
Am Sonntag, den 15.07.2012, 10:04 +0400 schrieb Stepan Golosunov:
> All recent patches appear to modify changelog for 6:0.8.3-4. However,
> 6:0.8.3-4 is already in testing.
Indeed, thanks for noticing. I have fixed this up in GIT.
BTW, we still have a bunch of Provides: fields in our debian/rules
10.07.2012 в 07:49:22 +0200 Reinhard Tartler написал:
> (please don't use 680613, as your won't show up on the pkg-multimedia
> archives and I cannot easily reply)
680613-quiet@ was a result of 680613-submitter@ without 680613@ in the
recipients of original mail. -submitter@ is not only documented
Hi,
(please don't use 680613, as your won't show up on the pkg-multimedia
archives and I cannot easily reply)
I've dropped the multi-arch headers now in this commit:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libav.git;a=commitdiff;h=a55d079b01da2c81de68af0ebdb86d07aec5f5c7
--
regards,
6 matches
Mail list logo
