On 2012-10-17 23:57, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I'd tend to agree that M-A:foreign for -dbg packages is always wrong.
>
> * Niels Thykier , 2012-09-03, 13:49:
>> For a library, I see the problem the "-dbg" has symbols for a "M-A:
>> same" package (e.g. a library). But for some package that is "M-A:
>> f
I'd tend to agree that M-A:foreign for -dbg packages is always wrong.
* Niels Thykier , 2012-09-03, 13:49:
For a library, I see the problem the "-dbg" has symbols for a "M-A:
same" package (e.g. a library). But for some package that is "M-A:
foreign", I don't see why the related "-dbg" package
On 2012-06-25 00:01, Carsten Hey wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> please add a check for multi-arch: foreign -dbg packages.
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec:
> | Multi-Arch: foreign
> | * The package is not co-installable with itself, but should be allowed
> |
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
please add a check for multi-arch: foreign -dbg packages.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec:
| Multi-Arch: foreign
| * The package is not co-installable with itself, but should be allowed
| to satisfy the dependencies of a package of a different arch
4 matches
Mail list logo