Stuart Chalmers wrote:
> I'm not sure about specific patches I'm afraid - the most common
> theme on the btrfs mailing list seems to be 'try the latest
> version'.
We'd be happy to be alerted to cases where that solved someone's
problem, so we can ensure the fix is applied to older stable kernels
Hi Jonathan,
I'm not sure about specific patches I'm afraid - the most common theme on
the btrfs mailing list seems to be 'try the latest version'.
With this in mind, perhaps sync to the upcoming 3.6 kernel (not sure how easy
or otherwise this is), or perhaps align to what Oracle and Suse have
Hi Stuart,
Stuart Chalmers wrote:
> For the release of Wheezy, please consider merging as recent a version of
> BTRFS
> code as is practical, to allow Wheezy to benefit from the bug fixes performed
> upstream since the release of linux 3.2.
That might be a good idea (I don't know what the btrfs
Package: linux-source-3.2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
For the release of Wheezy, please consider merging as recent a version of BTRFS
code as is practical, to allow Wheezy to benefit from the bug fixes performed
upstream since the release of linux 3.2.
Thanks.
-- System Information:
D
4 matches
Mail list logo
