> 31.07.2012, Peter Samuelson wrote (on debian-release):
> > There is no need to remove gromacs in order for lesstif2 to migrate.
> > There's no SONAME bump or anything. The issue only came up at all,
> > because we needed to make sure the new lesstif2 does not add any new
> > FTBFS in other pack
26.07.2012, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Michael Gilbert]
>> Make sure to file an unblock request bug for the release team to
>> review.
> I doubt they will want it at this point. I should have thought of this
> earlier: the new lesstif2 causes FTBFSs in dependent packages. I don't
> know how many y
[Michael Gilbert]
> Make sure to file an unblock request bug for the release team to
> review.
I doubt they will want it at this point. I should have thought of this
earlier: the new lesstif2 causes FTBFSs in dependent packages. I don't
know how many yet, as my workstation is still test-buildin
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Michael Gilbert]
>> Since the package hasn't been updated in an entire release cycle (i.e.
>> this version is the same one thats been in squeeze for 2 years), I
>> don't think there are likely to be any rc bugs in the current version,
>>
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Michael Gilbert]
>> If you wouldn't mind. Please go ahead with this. I'm already
>> causing too much trouble for the release team with my efforts on the
>> multiarch release goal.
>
> I saw your thread on debian-release. It looks like
[Michael Gilbert]
> If you wouldn't mind. Please go ahead with this. I'm already
> causing too much trouble for the release team with my efforts on the
> multiarch release goal.
I saw your thread on debian-release. It looks like they aren't very
interested in fixing this (and the new ia32-libs
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Michael Gilbert]
>> This package has not been updated in 3 years, so it is a prime
>> candidate for nmu'ing. In fact, it's perfectly appropriate to nmu
>> without advance permission of the maintainer in general.
>
> I noticed later that
[Michael Gilbert]
> This package has not been updated in 3 years, so it is a prime
> candidate for nmu'ing. In fact, it's perfectly appropriate to nmu
> without advance permission of the maintainer in general.
I noticed later that the new empty/dummy ia32-libs is not in wheezy, so
that makes thi
> IMO, this bug is important enough to fix in wheezy, as it affects the
> ability to upgrade ia32-libs. I'd be happy to NMU, if the maintainers
> don't mind.
This package has not been updated in 3 years, so it is a prime
candidate for nmu'ing. In fact, it's perfectly appropriate to nmu
without a
9 matches
Mail list logo
