Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:14:18AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > libreoffice (Rene is already working on that) uploaded. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-19 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 06/20/2012 07:14 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > - evolution was uploaded is currently still building. > > There is a build failure on s390. According to Julien this particular > error has been seen a couple of times and can be most likely fixed by > giving back the build. > Given back. > > evol

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-19 Thread Michael Biebl
On 19.06.2012 18:09, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 18.06.2012 15:31, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >> tags 677620 + pending >> thanks >> >> On 15/06/2012 14:13, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> >>> We want evolution 3.4 for wheezy. This means updating gtkhtml4.0, >>> evolution-data-server, evolution and the reverse depe

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-19 Thread Michael Biebl
On 18.06.2012 15:31, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > tags 677620 + pending > thanks > > On 15/06/2012 14:13, Michael Biebl wrote: >> >> We want evolution 3.4 for wheezy. This means updating gtkhtml4.0, >> evolution-data-server, evolution and the reverse dependencies of >> those packages. >> > > Please go a

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-19 Thread Michael Biebl
On 18.06.2012 18:41, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:13:25PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Involves several soname bumps: >> >> - libebook-1.2-12 → libebook-1.2-16 >> - libecal-1.2-10 → libecal-1.2-13 .. > Either I miss something, or the above is wrong: .. > - libebook-1.2-1

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:13:25PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Involves several soname bumps: > > - libebook-1.2-12 → libebook-1.2-16 > - libecal-1.2-10 → libecal-1.2-13 > - libedata-book-1.2-11 → libedata-book-1.2-13 > - libedataserver-1.2-15 → libedataserver-1.2-16 > - libcamel-1.2-29 → libcam

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 04:30:18PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/connectivity/source/drivers/evoab2/EApi.cxx?h=libreoffice-3-5-4 Oh, and evene if it built it obviously won't work ;) Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:13:25PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Involves several soname bumps: > > - libebook-1.2-12 → libebook-1.2-16 [...] > * binNMUs (build tested) [...] > - libreoffice Really? http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/connectivity/source/drivers/evoab2/EApi.cx

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-18 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
tags 677620 + pending thanks On 15/06/2012 14:13, Michael Biebl wrote: We want evolution 3.4 for wheezy. This means updating gtkhtml4.0, evolution-data-server, evolution and the reverse dependencies of those packages. Please go ahead with the uploads. Let's try to do this transition quickly

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hello, Adam D. Barratt (17/06/2012): > As I mentioned on IRC (possibly a little more grumpily than I should > have; sorry about that), this is somewhat late in the cycle, > particularly given that we'd previously asked for people to contact us > before May 20th. I realise that there are reasons

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 14:16 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 14:13 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > We want evolution 3.4 for wheezy. This means updating gtkhtml4.0, > > evolution-data-server, evolution and the reverse dependencies of those > > packages. > > As I mentioned on I

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 14:52 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 15:46:42 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: > > > We want evolution 3.4 for wheezy. This means updating gtkhtml4.0, > > > evolution-data-server, evolution and the reverse dependencies of those > > > packages. > > > > I thin

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 14:13 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > We want evolution 3.4 for wheezy. This means updating gtkhtml4.0, > evolution-data-server, evolution and the reverse dependencies of those > packages. As I mentioned on IRC (possibly a little more grumpily than I should have; sorry about th

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-17 Thread Jordi Mallach
Hi, On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 15:46:42 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: > > We want evolution 3.4 for wheezy. This means updating gtkhtml4.0, > > evolution-data-server, evolution and the reverse dependencies of those > > packages. > > I think this is too late and big transition in this stage of release.

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-15 Thread Touko Korpela
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:13:25PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > We want evolution 3.4 for wheezy. This means updating gtkhtml4.0, > evolution-data-server, evolution and the rev

Bug#677620: transition: GNOME 3.4: evolution 3.4

2012-06-15 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition We want evolution 3.4 for wheezy. This means updating gtkhtml4.0, evolution-data-server, evolution and the reverse dependencies of those packages. I'm not quite sure if we should setup s