May i ask what's best to do now ?
Shall i close this transition bug and reopen a new one
to latest libv8 version ?
Jérémy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I reopened the bug because i closed it too quickly.
It was on the assumption from a private message that
it wouldn't be accepted after all.
This transition is painless. Please initiate it.
Jérémy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
Hi Steven,
On 12-06-17 at 12:58pm, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 17/06/12 12:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I disagree that it is too late. We were only told it is less likely
> > to be approved the later we request it.
> I thought this transition had already been requested, approved, and
> j
On 17/06/12 12:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I disagree that it is too late. We were only told it is less likely to
> be approved the later we request it.
Hi,
I thought this transition had already been requested, approved, and just
waiting on an upload to stable?
On 15/06/12 00:34, Cyril Brule
[dropping cc - we should all be following bugreport by now]
On 12-06-17 at 01:22pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 17/06/2012 12:52, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >> according to [1] we have "After Sunday the 20th of May, any new
> >> transitions are likely not t
On 17/06/2012 12:52, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> according to [1] we have
>> "After Sunday the 20th of May, any new transitions are likely not to be
>> processed until after the release."
>>
>> So that transition is way too late, and the result is that lib
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Whoa - would you mind reconsidering that?
>>
> Why? He's done the right thing...
"three packages (with no other packages depending on them) needing a simple
rebuild" actually sounds feasible in a very shortest time.
But it's not up to me
On 12-06-17 at 01:04pm, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:52:40 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > > according to [1] we have "After Sunday the 20th of May, any new
> > > transitions are likely not to be processed until after the
>
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:52:40 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > according to [1] we have
> > "After Sunday the 20th of May, any new transitions are likely not to be
> > processed until after the release."
> >
> > So that transition is way too late,
On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> according to [1] we have
> "After Sunday the 20th of May, any new transitions are likely not to be
> processed until after the release."
>
> So that transition is way too late, and the result is that libv8 3.10.8
> should be uploaded to experimental inst
tag 677574 pending
thanks
Jérémy Lal (15/06/2012):
> * packages needing a simple rebuild (i checked them) :
> + libv8-i18n
> + osmium
> + drizzle
>
> * packages needing more work :
> nodejs (i'm maintaining it and it's ready to be uploaded)
>
> Please note that SONAME is libv8.so.3.10.8
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
i'd like to update libv8 3.8.9.20 to 3.10.8.
* packages needing a simple rebuild (i checked them) :
+ libv8-i18n
+ osmium
+ drizzle
* packages needing more work :
nodejs (i'
12 matches
Mail list logo
