XBoard has always had the XResources file, and I have always used that
and loved it, until the *%&$ing xboardrc file started overriding it.
So no, they weren't volatile at all.
That would still qualify as volatile, because XBoard would never write in the
XResources file. So whatever changes
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:57:19 +0200
"h.g. muller" wrote:
h> The manual in general does not list with every option whether it is
h> persistent or volatile.
Ian> It says this:
Ian> This section documents the command-line options to XBoard. You can
Ian> set these options in two ways: by typing the
At 09:45 2-1-2013 -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:31:34 +0200
"h.g. muller" wrote:
> The manual in general does not list with every option whether it is
> persistent or volatile.
It says this:
This section documents the command-line options to XBoard. You
ca
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:31:34 +0200
"h.g. muller" wrote:
> The manual in general does not list with every option whether it is
> persistent or volatile.
It says this:
This section documents the command-line options to XBoard. You
can set these options in two ways: by typing them
At 19:27 1-1-2013 -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:18:15 +0200
"h.g. muller" wrote:
h> I intentionally disabled persistence of the -inc option by forcing
h> its value to -1 in the last line of the xboard.conf master settings
h> file. This was motivated by the fact that a saved
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:18:15 +0200
"h.g. muller" wrote:
h> I intentionally disabled persistence of the -inc option by forcing
h> its value to -1 in the last line of the xboard.conf master settings
h> file. This was motivated by the fact that a saved -inc value >= 0
h> would cause the -mps option
I intentionally disabled persistence of the -inc option by forcing its
value to -1 in the last line of the xboard.conf master settings file. This
was motivated by the fact that a saved -inc value >= 0 would cause the -mps
option to be ignored, even when the latter is explicitly specified on the
forwarded 677313 https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36673
thanks
Hi,
Ian Zimmerman writes:
> Quite annoyingly, xboard seems to ignore this option when it is given in
> a configuration file (doesn't matter if the top level one or one
> included with -settingsFile), and to always force a "classic" ti
Package: xboard
Version: 4.6.2-1
Severity: normal
Quite annoyingly, xboard seems to ignore this option when it is given in
a configuration file (doesn't matter if the top level one or one
included with -settingsFile), and to always force a "classic" time
control on startup. This can be changed in
9 matches
Mail list logo
