Bug#677278: Please depend on debconf | debconf-2.0

2013-02-12 Thread Régis Boudin
Hi Steve, Thanks for the reply. Considering the extension was actually initially implemented in cdebconf, as explained in the debconf changelog, yes, cdebconf does support it. I didn't check which version first introduced it, but a quick look shows that it was present as early as 2003, so I sup

Bug#677278: Please depend on debconf | debconf-2.0

2013-02-11 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 677278 - patch tags 677278 moreinfo thanks Hi Regis, On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:38:10PM +0200, Regis Boudin wrote: > As cdebconf is becoming actually usable, I started looking at removing > debconf on a test system, and noticed that libpam-runtime depends on > debconf only. The attached patc

Bug#677278: Please depend on debconf | debconf-2.0

2012-06-12 Thread Regis Boudin
Package: libpam-runtime Version: 1.1.3-7.1 Tags: patch Hi, As cdebconf is becoming actually usable, I started looking at removing debconf on a test system, and noticed that libpam-runtime depends on debconf only. The attached patch adds "| debconf-2.0" to the debconf dependency. Thanks in advanc