On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:05:33 +0200
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 05 juin 2012 à 16:24 +0200, Ricardo Mones a écrit :
> > I don't know about that git precedent.
>
> There was an old package named git. Then a new one, more popular,
> originally named git-core.
> Now git is what people exp
Le mardi 05 juin 2012 à 16:24 +0200, Ricardo Mones a écrit :
> I don't know about that git precedent.
There was an old package named git. Then a new one, more popular,
originally named git-core.
Now git is what people expect git to be on a Linux system. And epiphany
is not.
> Anyway my opinio
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:24:45PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 05 juin 2012 à 09:01 +0200, Michael Stummvoll a écrit :
> > Package: epiphany,epiphany-browser
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Dear Maintainers,
> >
> > the package "epiphany" provides the binary "epiphany-game"
> >
Le mardi 05 juin 2012 à 09:01 +0200, Michael Stummvoll a écrit :
> Package: epiphany,epiphany-browser
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainers,
>
> the package "epiphany" provides the binary "epiphany-game"
> tha binary "epiphany" is provided by the package "epiphany-browser"
>
> thats very conf
reopen 676163
thanks
Hi there,
> > thats very confusing.
>
> You have explained it to me right away and then tell me it's
> confusing... is that a joke or what?
That I can explain the situation does not indicate that it is not
confusing. Furthermore i usually doesnt use the BTS for sharing jo
Package: epiphany,epiphany-browser
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainers,
the package "epiphany" provides the binary "epiphany-game"
tha binary "epiphany" is provided by the package "epiphany-browser"
thats very confusing. May the Maintainers of the packages should find a
way to clearify this.
kind
6 matches
Mail list logo
