On 02.06.2012 23:29, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> In any case, the program fails to build with valac-0.16. So I'm going
> to shelve this issue for a while, in the expectation that a fix will
> come down the pipe from upstream in due course.
ok, would be great then if you can forward this issue t
In any case, the program fails to build with valac-0.16. So I'm going
to shelve this issue for a while, in the expectation that a fix will
come down the pipe from upstream in due course.
--Barak.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@list
On 02.06.2012 21:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Just depend on valac (>= min-version) then.
>
> c/ you are using features of vala which are likely to break with a new
> major upgrade. Fortunately this has become much less of an issue.
>
There were several incompatible changes in the past, e.g. the
On 02.06.2012 21:30, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> No problem.
>
> Is there some way for me to indicate a build dependency on the
> currently preferred version of valac, so I don't have to constantly
> rev the control file? I would note that many other compilers in
> Debian (gcc, for instance) ha
No problem.
Is there some way for me to indicate a build dependency on the
currently preferred version of valac, so I don't have to constantly
rev the control file? I would note that many other compilers in
Debian (gcc, for instance) have some way to not require packages to
specify which particul
5 matches
Mail list logo
