Bug#675436: openssl: Buffer overflow vulnerability

2016-03-19 Thread Vin Buccigrossi
Ok so I took a look through and the bug is present in older versions of open ssl but it seems as of 1.0.2g it has been fixed. Thank you, Vinny On Mar 13, 2016 11:40 AM, "Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" wrote: > I tried to reproduce the bug and before that I look at > PEM_def_callback() / EVP_read_pw_

Bug#675436: openssl: Buffer overflow vulnerability

2016-03-13 Thread Vin Buccigrossi
Last time I check the bug was still present. I will check and let you know if I still see it. Thank you, Vinny On Mar 13, 2016 11:40 AM, "Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" wrote: > I tried to reproduce the bug and before that I look at > PEM_def_callback() / EVP_read_pw_string_min() where the input pas

Bug#675436: openssl: Buffer overflow vulnerability

2016-03-13 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
I tried to reproduce the bug and before that I look at PEM_def_callback() / EVP_read_pw_string_min() where the input password is read / checked for valid length. The limit is sometimes 1024 sometimes larger but it never overwrites anything. I tried various tests ala openssl x509 -days 3650 -CA ca

Bug#675436: OpenSSL Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

2013-06-05 Thread Henri Salo
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:33:55PM -0400, vin Buccigrossi wrote: > It has no CVE number but I will package up all of the file and every thing > we used in testing and send it over to you. Hello Buccigrossi, I'm still waiting for the examples and use cases (test files) for this OpenSSL buffer over

Bug#675436: openssl: Buffer overflow vulnerability

2012-06-01 Thread Henri Salo
Package: openssl Version: 0.9.8o-4squeeze13 Severity: important Tags: security Description from email: http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2012/May/155 A buffer overflow vulnerability has been discovered within the OpenSSL command line utility. The vulnerability is revealed within the signing of a cert