hi,
thanks for working on the package
please also incorporate the other changes applied in ubuntu, those
include multiarchification but also some other changes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
> Why is it such important?
This is juste that I try to install one of my package libtango8:i386 and
libtango8:amd64 on one machine I have some troubles because
libpgm and omniorb-dfsg were not multi archied.
> - multiarch
> This is OK.
> - no more static and .la files
> Why do you disable the
Hi Picca,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:29 PM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
wrote:
> do you mind if I do an NMU with the attached patch targetting experimental ?
Why is it such important?
> - multiarch
This is OK.
> - no more static and .la files
Why do you disable these? Anyone may need the static l
Hello, I did an update of the patch for the 5.1.118-1~dfsg-2 version
do you mind if I do an NMU with the attached patch targetting experimental ?
- multiarch
- no more static and .la files
- modernize the rules file
Cheers
FredericFrom 83c45f71c2c876c5641e495c3da141236fc94485 Mon Sep 17 00:00:0
Package: libpgm
Version: 4.3.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
please multiarch the package.
Attached a patch following these guidelines:
http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation
diff -Nru libpgm-5.1.118-1~dfsg/debian/change
5 matches
Mail list logo
