It *IS* backported already and we *WILL* upload it as an update to
Stable. But since this is not a critical issue [1] and since uploads to
Stable are extremely sensitive it may well be we wait for another issue
we need to fix in Stable as well.
[1] it is a browser issue in reality, no really.
I
Is there any way to get a .deb of this at all or is it purely a waiting game?
James Greig
Hi,
On 11/22/2012 11:12 AM, James Greig wrote:
> Out of interest, you said it is already backported? I'm using
> squeeze-backports but it hasn't appeared as an update? Am I doing something
> wrong here?
I meant, I backported the patch in our source code repository:
http://anonscm.debian.org/g
Hi Arno,
Thanks for your reply. I appreciate that it's a client side issue and apache
is just compensating for this so the efforts are fully appreciated especially
with free software. It's just unfortunate that the PCI compliance companies
are treating it as a requirement that the servers sho
On 11/21/2012 10:32 AM, James Greig wrote:
> I second the last message. I have a number of systems failing PCI compliance
> that run squeeze so would really welcome this patch to debian squeeze even if
> it's backported.
It *IS* backported already and we *WILL* upload it as an update to
Stable.
Hi,
I second the last message. I have a number of systems failing PCI compliance
that run squeeze so would really welcome this patch to debian squeeze even if
it's backported.
James Greig
On Wednesday 06 June 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23.05.2012 12:17, Bjoern Jacke wrote:
> > Please consider to add the patch from
> > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53219 to the
> > Debian package.
>
> as you might have noticed Stefan was committing your patch
> upstrea
Hi,
On 23.05.2012 12:17, Bjoern Jacke wrote:
> Please consider to add the patch from
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53219 to the Debian
> package.
as you might have noticed Stefan was committing your patch upstream.
Thus, it might be included in upcoming releases for the 2.
Package: apache2
Version: 2.2.16
Owner: debian-apa...@lists.debian.org
Some browsers like Chrome/Chromium but also cmdline clients using openssl like
wget support ssl compression. This is a big problem for ssl enabled servers
when they offer big files. Pulling for example a (already compressed) 10
9 matches
Mail list logo
