> try
> aptitude install texlive-base/unstable texlive-common/unstable
> texlive-doc-base/unstable
I tried something similar, namely:
aptitude install -t unstable texlive
and all the packages seem to be working well.
--
-Sanjoy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.
Sanjoy Mahajan writes:
> However, when I try to install the newest version, I get:
>
> # aptitude install texlive-base/unstable
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> texlive-base{b} [2011.20120424-1 -> 2012.20120516-1]
> The following partially installed packages will be configured:
>
Norbert,
> How do you come to this line ... I have
> unshift (@INC, "/usr/share/texlive/tlpkg");
Good question. I didn't change anything in updmap by hand. But then I
don't understand how it became different. I went through the
texlive-binaries-*.deb files in the /var/cache/apt/archives/
Hi Sanjoy,
On Di, 22 Mai 2012, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
> chomp($TEXMFROOT = `kpsewhich -var-value=TEXMFROOT`);
> unshift (@INC, "$TEXMFROOT/tlpkg");
How do you come to this line ... I have
unshift (@INC, "/usr/share/texlive/tlpkg");
there?
Did you do something specific?
Best wishes
N
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2012.20120516-1
Severity: normal
Configuring tex-common always fails for me now when updmap-sys runs:
Setting up tex-common (3.11) ...
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
Running mtxrun --generate. This may take some time... done.
Running
5 matches
Mail list logo
