retitle 673648 vpnc: stop to ship vpnc-script and depend on common vpnc-scripts
package instead
block 673648 by 675131
thanks
Hi Mike,
> > a) src:vpnc builds a new package vpnc-script(s) containing the script in
> > its current location with legacy patches, perhaps including a few more
> > comm
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Mike Miller wrote:
> If you agree that the best long-term solution is a separate
> src:vpnc-scripts package, then I will start working on that.
I have finally gotten around to filing an ITP for vpnc-scripts [1] and
will be working on getting that package into Debi
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Florian Schlichting
wrote:
> [...]
> a) src:vpnc builds a new package vpnc-script(s) containing the script in
> its current location with legacy patches, perhaps including a few more
> commits which I expect upstrem to commit to SVN until the end of May;
> after w
Hi Mike,
you're right to keep following up on this issue, even though seeing as
time flies and the freeze approaches, I'm not sure I'm going to change
mutch for vpnc before wheezy. There are a few patches in vpnc-script,
some of which are upstream now but not yet synced to vpnc SVN, and
others whi
Package: vpnc
Severity: normal
Hi Florian, I want to get this done before the upcoming freeze and I
want to have a public record of our discussion.
We've been talking about splitting vpnc-script from vpnc for a few
weeks now but no concrete plans yet. This could be done from your
vpnc source pac
5 matches
Mail list logo
