Bug#673298: transition: openturns

2012-05-19 Thread Cyril Brulebois
tag 673298 pending block 673298 by 673544 thanks Cyril Brulebois (18/05/2012): > Doesn't look too painful indeed, please go ahead. Uploaded, so tagging pending. Blocking with the s390 FTBFS (which is a regression). Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#673298: transition: openturns

2012-05-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Denis Barbier (17/05/2012): > We would like to have openturns 1.0 in wheezy. It has only one > reverse dependency, feel++, which is in unstable only. I did not > check whether feel++ builds fine with openturns 1.0, but am pretty > sure that Christophe already took care of that. Openturns 1.0 has >

Bug#673298: transition: openturns

2012-05-17 Thread Denis Barbier
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, We would like to have openturns 1.0 in wheezy. It has only one reverse dependency, feel++, which is in unstable only. I did not ch