Bug#673276: lintian: please add check to detect incompatible java bytecode versions

2012-06-05 Thread Matthew Johnson
This is somewhat complicated by the fact that on kfreebsd we still don't have openjdk, so we're using GCJ/GIJ, which is really a 1.5 implementation. If GCJ/GIJ can run 1.6 bytecode then absolutely this check should be 1.6 and you can ignore the rest of this mail. If it cannot, then it's more comp

Bug#673276: lintian: please add check to detect incompatible java bytecode versions

2012-05-18 Thread James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Russ On 17/05/12 21:07, Russ Allbery wrote: >> To ensure that java libraries are compatible with all versions of >> Java >>> in the archive, it would be great to have a lintian check which >>> warnings if the minimum bytecode version is exceeded

Bug#673276: lintian: please add check to detect incompatible java bytecode versions

2012-05-17 Thread Russ Allbery
James Page writes: > Its possible to get into the situation where bytecode is generated from > source code that is not backwards compatible - javac by default will > generate bytecode that is only forwards compatible. > To ensure that java libraries are compatible with all versions of Java > in

Bug#673276: lintian: please add check to detect incompatible java bytecode versions

2012-05-17 Thread James Page
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.7 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Currently Debian and Ubuntu ship three versions of Java - 5, 6 and 7. Its possible to get into the situation where bytecode is generated from source code that is not backwards compatible - javac by d