Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: systemd does not allow suspend to ram

2012-05-18 Thread roberto_g
that was the problem! now kde suspends well. I see that kde-workspace-bin recommends upower but does not depends on it. This should be changed maybe? B.t.w. kpowersave still works when hald is running; it seems that this is not conflicting at all. Anyway I'll take a look to the new plasmoids...

Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: systemd does not allow suspend to ram

2012-05-18 Thread Michael Biebl
On 18.05.2012 21:11, robert...@libero.it wrote: > attached. > > > On ven 18 mag 2012, Michael Biebl wrote: >> What's the output of >> "systemctl status dbus.service dbus.socket upower.service >> console-kit-daemon.service". >> >> Or better, just attach the output of "systemctl dump" You don't ha

Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: systemd does not allow suspend to ram

2012-05-18 Thread Michael Biebl
On 18.05.2012 20:55, robert...@libero.it wrote: > I don't have a heavily tweaked system: the only thing I had to make > kpowersave work is to have hald running. I can launch it by an init script > or by a simple 'sudo hald'. The hald daemon is just that from the installed > hal_0.5.14-8 package.

Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: systemd does not allow suspend to ram

2012-05-18 Thread roberto_g
I don't have a heavily tweaked system: the only thing I had to make kpowersave work is to have hald running. I can launch it by an init script or by a simple 'sudo hald'. The hald daemon is just that from the installed hal_0.5.14-8 package. This is not a tweak. The problem is that kde is perfec

Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: systemd does not allow suspend to ram

2012-05-18 Thread Michael Biebl
On 18.05.2012 19:51, robert...@libero.it wrote: > Btw, I'm on linux because I can control the system at each level, if I > wanted a dumb (and locked) ready-to-use system I'd go on a mac. > > I use to perform some heavy calculation sometimes that raise the system > temperature. Then I have to lim

Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: systemd does not allow suspend to ram

2012-05-18 Thread roberto_g
Btw, I'm on linux because I can control the system at each level, if I wanted a dumb (and locked) ready-to-use system I'd go on a mac. I use to perform some heavy calculation sometimes that raise the system temperature. Then I have to limit the frequency in order to avoid overheating. In additi

Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: systemd does not allow suspend to ram

2012-05-18 Thread robert...@libero.it
t the system doesn't suspend... >Messaggio originale >Da: bi...@debian.org >Data: 18/05/2012 15.23 >A: "robert...@libero.it", <673...@bugs.debian.org> >Ogg: Re: Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: systemd does not allow suspend to ram > >On 18.05.201

Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: systemd does not allow suspend to ram

2012-05-18 Thread Michael Biebl
On 18.05.2012 14:51, robert...@libero.it wrote: > Yes, I'm sure I'm using kpowersave :) > I have a debian-sid with the latest kde. I would not use kpowersave if I had > an equivalent tool that allows me to check/switch the cpu-freq from systray. > Anyway, I don't think kpowersave issue is relate

Bug#673192: R: Re: Bug#673192: systemd does not allow suspend to ram

2012-05-18 Thread robert...@libero.it
Yes, I'm sure I'm using kpowersave :) I have a debian-sid with the latest kde. I would not use kpowersave if I had an equivalent tool that allows me to check/switch the cpu-freq from systray. Anyway, I don't think kpowersave issue is relate to suspend one. Why kde cannot suspend? And why the ha