Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
> I don't think we should cater to such use cases. Indeed, I was unconvinced
> that we should split the binary packages at all for this; but having done
I notice that I forgot to explain the reasons for which I did the
split: I have found admins at my
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:38:31AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > (Also, I don't see why you didn't just make libpam-winbind depend on
> > libnss-winbind. #646292 requests the ability to install the NSS modules
> > without the PAM modules, but not vice versa. So why not just make the
> > PAM
Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@ubuntu.com):
>
> I'd recommend, in libnss-winbind:
>
> Breaks: libpam-winbind (<< 2:3.6.5-2)
> Replaces: libpam-winbind (<< 2:3.6.5-2)
Oh, right. That was indeed forgotten when I "created" the new package
by copy/paste in debian/control. /me bashes self for no
3 matches
Mail list logo
