On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 23:45:52 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I'd like to upload a recent libcdio to unstable.
> Unfortunately, as usual with libcdio
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 00:15:30 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> As you (Julien) discovered, mednafen has a potential FTBFS related to its
> construction of Built-Using (#677867). Given that the current package binNMU'd
> correctly on all platforms except hurd-i386, I suppose I should wait until
> th
Hi,
On Mon, 14 May 2012 01:00:40 +0200, Julien Cristau
wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 00:30:10 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> > ¹ I somehow missed the requirement to request transitions as bug reports
> > against the release.debian.org pseudo-package, and asked it about 2
> > months ago as
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Thanks for your patience. It should be fine to go ahead now. #676100
> will need to be fixed, but that may just mean dropping the
> libxmmsclient-ruby* packages.
Ok, thanks. I just uploaded libcdio 0.83-4 to unstable.
Cheers,
-
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 23:45:52 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Please tell me whether/when I can upload to unstable.
>
Thanks for your patience. It should be fine to go ahead now. #676100
will need to be fixed, but that may just mean dropping the
libxmmsclient-ruby* packages.
Cheers,
Julien
Hi again,
Nicolas Boullis (13/05/2012):
> If I understand what a "ben file" is, I think a "ben file" for this
> transition could be:
>
> title = "libcdio";
> is_affected = .depends ~ /libcdio-cdda[01]/ | .depends ~
> /libcdio-paranoia[01]/ | .depends ~ /libcdio1[03]/ | .depends ~
> /libiso966
Hi Nicolas,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 00:30:10 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> ¹ I somehow missed the requirement to request transitions as bug reports
> against the release.debian.org pseudo-package, and asked it about 2
> months ago as a simple e-mail to debian-release@l.d.o, but my message
>
Hi KiBi,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:19:57AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> does it mean the API didn't change much,
That's true.
> and that you test-rebuilt those packages?
Unfortunately not.
I test-rebuilt vcdimager (which lead me to patching libcdio to revert a
change in i
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Boullis (13/05/2012):
> A binNMU should be enough for all these packages.
does it mean the API didn't change much, and that you test-rebuilt those
packages?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
I'd like to upload a recent libcdio to unstable.
Unfortunately, as usual with libcdio, upgrading from 0.81 to 0.83
means breaking the ABI and changing the sonames of t
10 matches
Mail list logo
