Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-05 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:40:51PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:58:30 +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:26:17PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: > > > Package: luajit > > > Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 > > > Severity: grave > > > Tags: upstream

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:58:30 +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:26:17PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: > > Package: luajit > > Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 > > Severity: grave > > Tags: upstream > > > > In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, b

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-04 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:26:17PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: > Package: luajit > Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 > Severity: grave > Tags: upstream > > In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, but rather > be made available via backports. Sooo, how is ulatencyd affected? It

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-03 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
clone 672657 -1 -2 -3 reassign -1 uwsgi retitle -1 uwsgi: Needs to switch from luajit to lua reassign -2 ulatencyd retitle -2 ulatencyd: Needs to switch from luajit to lua reassign -3 mudlet retitle -3 mudlet: Needs to switch from luajit to lua thanks On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 10:34:47PM +0200, Enri

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-02 Thread Enrico Tassi
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 07:12:47PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > uwsgi > ulatencyd > mudlet As I suspected all the dependencies are "soft", so we can just drop them in favour of liblua5.1-0-dev. But of course these packages have to be uploaded to fix the issue. Cheers -- Enrico Tassi --

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-02 Thread Enrico Tassi
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 07:12:47PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, > > but rather be made available via backports. > > What makes luajit not acceptable for Wheezy? That the upstream prefers not to have a beta version of luaji

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-07-02 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Hi Enrico, On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:26:17PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote: > Package: luajit > Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 > Severity: grave > Tags: upstream > > In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, but rather > be made available via backports. What makes luajit not a

Bug#672657: Not suitable for weezy

2012-05-12 Thread Enrico Tassi
Package: luajit Version: 2.0.0~beta9+dfsg-2 Severity: grave Tags: upstream In accordance with the upstream, luajit will not be part of weezy, but rather be made available via backports. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (5