Hi,
On Samstag, 26. Mai 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> libextractor-python | python-extractor uninstallable: #674616
> doddle | FTBFS: #674333
> libextractor-java| FTBFS: #674359
I've just successfully rebuild these on sid/amd64 with the versions in
experimental and would be w
Hi,
On Sonntag, 27. Mai 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> This also means that vdr (and dozens of related packages) can't migrate,
eek.
> Alternative way of getting stuff unfucked at this point: reupload the
> old package (with an epoch, or with a $foo.really-is.$bar trick), until
> you're able to
Cyril Brulebois (26/05/2012):
> libextractor-python | python-extractor uninstallable: #674616
> doddle | FTBFS: #674333
> fossology| FTBFS: #674381
> libextractor-java| FTBFS: #674359
>
> (No, I didn't look into gnunet*, too much fail already.)
This also means that
block 672117 by 674333 674381 674359 674616
thanks
Cyril Brulebois (20/05/2012):
> BinNMUs will follow shortly.
libextractor-python | python-extractor uninstallable: #674616
doddle | FTBFS: #674333
fossology| FTBFS: #674381
libextractor-java| FTBFS: #674359
(No, I
tag 672117 pending
thanks
Bertrand Marc (17/05/2012):
> Despite the wontfix tag on the RFS, libextractor got uploaded to
> unstable with gnunet...
Tracker is at:
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libextractor.html
BinNMUs will follow shortly.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description:
Hello,
Despite the wontfix tag on the RFS, libextractor got uploaded to
unstable with gnunet...
Bertrand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bertrand Marc (09/05/2012):
> Ok, I didn't want to mess up with an ongoing transition. But don't you
> think a 'wontfix' tag on the RFS is a bit final ? Wouldn't a simple
> 'blocked by' be enough ?
I didn't set that tag. And it can be removed at any time when the
situation clears up. So it's not
Hi Cyril,
2012/5/8 Cyril Brulebois :
> Did you a rebuild test for the reverse dependencies?
Thobias Grimm confirmed a few weeks ago that vdr-plugin-xineliboutput
builds fine with libextractor3. And at this time it seemed to me the
other reverse deps were from the GNUnet stack, so they are written
Hi Bertrand.
Bertrand Marc (08/05/2012):
> Upstream released a new version, bumping the ABI version (SONAME) from
> 1c2a to 3.
>
> Among the reverse deps, it may not be necessary to binNMU gnunet,
> since a new version is waiting for a sponsor on mentors.
Did you a rebuild test for the reverse
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I am filing this bug for the transition of the "libextractor" package.
Upstream released a new version, bumping the ABI version (SONAME) from
1c2a to 3.
Among the
10 matches
Mail list logo
