Bug#671624: workaround

2012-05-06 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 06.05.12 marc.carter-ceqo...@cool.fr.nf (marc.carter-ceqo...@cool.fr.nf) wrote: Hi, > > After exchanging both \usepackage commands the minimal example > > compiles fine. Could you confirm if the document generates the > > expected results? > > Indeed, swapping the two \usepackage statements

Bug#671624: workaround

2012-05-06 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi, > Ultimatetly this is still a bug to fix though, IMO. But not by us, nor by the TeX Live maintainers, but by the author of invoice. There is no guarantee and there never has been that all packages can be used together, nir that if they once were useable together then they will be forever.

Bug#671624: workaround

2012-05-06 Thread marc . carter-ceqosy2
> Not sure, why you used \RequirePackage here, I could reproduce the > problem when using \usepackage{graphicx}. I'm not sure why I used \RequirePackage either - the original document that broke in the etch->squeeze transation is autogenerated. > After exchanging both \usepackage commands the min