severity 671610 minor
tags 671610 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi all,
On Sa, 05 Mai 2012, Hilmar PreuÃe wrote:
> This is just the sub-bug. The initial problem (tex-common tries to
> remove a file w/o checking if it exists (row 406 in tex-common
> postinst) still exists.
Yes ... ok ... but in his ca
On 05.05.12 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi,
> > This is just the sub-bug. The initial problem (tex-common tries to
> > remove a file w/o checking if it exists (row 406 in tex-common
> > postinst) still exists.
>
>
> I disagree, these are two independent bugs. One about the tex-c
On Sat, 05 May 2012 21:53:28 +0200
Frank Küster wrote:
> Then, maybe, it is a *different* package that removed
> /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf? Do you have dpkg logfiles, and could you check
> whether there were any tex-related removals?
this seems to be all i can find. all of which is related to the p
subhuman wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2012 23:42:38 +0900
> Norbert Preining wrote:
>
>>
>> > Setting up tex-common (3.10) ...
>> > rm: cannot remove /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf': No such file or directory
>>
>> Did you *upgrade* or make a new installation?
>
> a new installation on a brandnew hdd (well, s
On Sat, 5 May 2012 23:42:38 +0900
Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> > Setting up tex-common (3.10) ...
> > rm: cannot remove /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf': No such file or directory
>
> Did you *upgrade* or make a new installation?
a new installation on a brandnew hdd (well, some weeks ago, and i've run a f
Hi Hilmar,
> This is just the sub-bug. The initial problem (tex-common tries to
> remove a file w/o checking if it exists (row 406 in tex-common
> postinst) still exists.
I disagree, these are twoindependent bugs. One about the tex-common trying ro
remove texmf.cnf (which has to be here), and o
On 05.05.12 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi,
> PS I tend to close the bug, we don't care forbugs in temporary
> releases that never made it into stable and are not existing
> anymore.
>
This is just the sub-bug. The initial problem (tex-common tries to
remove a file w/o checking i
Hi,
>> This should have been fixed in latest jadetex. Which version are you
>> using?
> 3.13-13
How do you have still this version? It is neither in testing nor in unstable
...?
Norbert
PS I tend to close the bug, we don't care forbugs in temporary releases that
never made it into stable and
> Setting up tex-common (3.10) ...
> rm: cannot remove /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf': No such file or directory
Did you *upgrade* or make a new installation?
If you made an upgrade this file should be be present before upgrade, or did
you remove some file by hand as root? Without caring for consequence
On Sat, 5 May 2012 16:19:18 +0200
Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> This should have been fixed in latest jadetex. Which version are you
> using?
3.13-13
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 05.05.12 Martin Haase (discipl...@gmx.net) wrote:
Hi,
> Package: tex-common
> Version: 3.10
> Severity: normal
>
> here's the output dpkg produces:
> -
> legoland:/home/...# dpkg --force-all --configure -a
> Setting up tex-common (3.10) ...
> rm: cannot remove /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf': No su
11 matches
Mail list logo
