* Carsten Hey [2012-05-11 00:58 +0200]:
> * Carsten Hey [2012-04-30 02:00 +0200]:
> > * Roger Leigh [2012-04-29 23:19 +0100]:
> > > > > how do other distributions handle noauto in this situation? Do they
> > > > > respect it, ignore it, or not look at fstab at all?
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > >
> > >
* Carsten Hey [2012-04-30 02:00 +0200]:
> * Roger Leigh [2012-04-29 23:19 +0100]:
> > I was just thinking, is there a way to detect if the system was
> > bootstrapped with grml-bootstrap compared with plain debootstrap? If
> > that was the case, we could put a specific check for that in, and
> > cl
* Roger Leigh [2012-04-29 23:19 +0100]:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:16:48PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > So the correct thing could, besides doing it manually, only be done in
> > a maintainer script of an essential package, but as you explained, doing
> > this would be wrong. I think we agree t
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:16:48PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> [ Dropping hmh from Cc, I was not sure if he's one of the uploaders
> and thus should receive the mail anyway - but I looked it up now. ]
>
> * Roger Leigh [2012-04-28 20:17 +0100]:
> > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Carst
[ Dropping hmh from Cc, I was not sure if he's one of the uploaders
and thus should receive the mail anyway - but I looked it up now. ]
* Roger Leigh [2012-04-28 20:17 +0100]:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [2012-04-28 12:11 -0300
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [2012-04-28 12:11 -0300]:
> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > > The problem is that installing Squeeze via grml-debootstrap perfectly
> > > works and after upgrading to Wheezy udev will not star
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [2012-04-28 12:11 -0300]:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > The problem is that installing Squeeze via grml-debootstrap perfectly
> > works and after upgrading to Wheezy udev will not start. A wrongly
> > generated /etc/fstab can't be fixed for existing sy
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Roger Leigh [2012-04-24 16:31 +0100]:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:55:55PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > > * Carsten Hey [Mon Apr 23, 2012 at 01:07:17 +0200]:
> > >
> > > > Please ignore noauto sysfs entries in fstab. Not mounting sysfs to /sys
> >
* Roger Leigh [2012-04-24 16:31 +0100]:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:55:55PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > * Carsten Hey [Mon Apr 23, 2012 at 01:07:17 +0200]:
> >
> > > Please ignore noauto sysfs entries in fstab. Not mounting sysfs to /sys
> > > if such a line is present in fstab leads to udev
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:55:55PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> * Carsten Hey [Mon Apr 23, 2012 at 01:07:17 +0200]:
>
> > Please ignore noauto sysfs entries in fstab. Not mounting sysfs to /sys
> > if such a line is present in fstab leads to udev not starting.
>
> > If this bug is not fixed, t
* Carsten Hey [Mon Apr 23, 2012 at 01:07:17 +0200]:
> Please ignore noauto sysfs entries in fstab. Not mounting sysfs to /sys
> if such a line is present in fstab leads to udev not starting.
> If this bug is not fixed, this problems will show up after upgrading to
> Wheezy on some systems.
[...]
Package: initscripts
Bug summary:
Please ignore noauto sysfs entries in fstab. Not mounting sysfs to /sys
if such a line is present in fstab leads to udev not starting.
If this bug is not fixed, this problems will show up after upgrading to
Wheezy on some systems.
Bug details:
Gregor Thill
12 matches
Mail list logo
