Hi Denis
thanks for your work !
I uploaded a new feel++ version which works fine with openturns
(openturns-wrapper is no more and was causing ftbs)
it is all good on the feel++ front.
Best regards
C.
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 9:28 AM, D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2012/5/17 D. Barbier wrote:
> > On 201
On 2012/5/17 D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2012/5/17 Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
>> I think It should go in unstable. I don't think there are that many users
>> and OT1.0 fixes a few things as well as provide many new features
>
> Hello Christophe,
>
> Too late, it has been uploaded into experimental ;-)
On 2012/5/17 Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> I think It should go in unstable. I don't think there are that many users
> and OT1.0 fixes a few things as well as provide many new features
Hello Christophe,
Too late, it has been uploaded into experimental ;-)
I followed the procedure about library t
I think It should go in unstable. I don't think there are that many users
and
OT1.0 fixes a few things as well as provide many new features
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:50 PM, D. Barbier wrote:
> When testing upgrades from current openturns packages, I realized that
> libopenturns0 and libopentur
On 2012/5/15 D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2012/5/15 trophime wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 01:43 +0200, D. Barbier wrote:
>>> On 2012/5/14 Aron Xu wrote:
>>> > The test build failed on amd64 and i386, at the same place. Attached
>>> > is my change to your git tree and the build log produced on amd64.
>
On 2012/5/15 trophime wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 01:43 +0200, D. Barbier wrote:
>> On 2012/5/14 Aron Xu wrote:
>> > The test build failed on amd64 and i386, at the same place. Attached
>> > is my change to your git tree and the build log produced on amd64.
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Here is an updated
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 01:43 +0200, D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2012/5/14 Aron Xu wrote:
> > The test build failed on amd64 and i386, at the same place. Attached
> > is my change to your git tree and the build log produced on amd64.
>
> Hello,
>
> Here is an updated status; I did not encounter your pro
On 2012/5/14 Aron Xu wrote:
> The test build failed on amd64 and i386, at the same place. Attached
> is my change to your git tree and the build log produced on amd64.
Hello,
Here is an updated status; I did not encounter your problems because
my upstream tarball was buggy, we should now be in sy
The test build failed on amd64 and i386, at the same place. Attached
is my change to your git tree and the build log produced on amd64.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
0001-fixes-for-build-test.patch
Description: Binary data
openturns_1.0-1_20120513_2352.log.xz
Description: Binary data
Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:47 AM, D. Barbier wrote:
> On 2012/5/10 Aron Xu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Freeze is approaching, is there any news on version 1.0? Or do we need
>> to fix open bugs and release with 0.15?
>
> Hello,
>
> IMO https://github.com/dbarbier/deb-ot is in a pretty good shape.
> So
On 2012/5/10 Aron Xu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Freeze is approaching, is there any news on version 1.0? Or do we need
> to fix open bugs and release with 0.15?
Hello,
IMO https://github.com/dbarbier/deb-ot is in a pretty good shape.
Some polishing may be needed, my laptop is not powerful and take hours
to
Hi,
Freeze is approaching, is there any news on version 1.0? Or do we need
to fix open bugs and release with 0.15?
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Le 23 avril 2012 07:14, Christophe Prud'homme a écrit :
> Denis
>
> This work(debian packaging) is also done by Phimeca who maintains
> openturns, or did you use their work ?
>
> I do not have preferences for the soname
I did not use their packaging, mostly because it was simpler for me to
work
Denis
This work(debian packaging) is also done by Phimeca who maintains
openturns, or did you use their work ?
I do not have preferences for the soname
see ya
C.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:06 AM, D. Barbier wrote:
> Le 22 avril 2012 22:11, D. Barbier a écrit :
> > Le 22 avril 2012 20:31, D.
Le 22 avril 2012 22:11, D. Barbier a écrit :
> Le 22 avril 2012 20:31, D. Barbier a écrit :
>> Le 22 avril 2012 20:19, Christophe Prud'homme a écrit :
>>> Denis
>>>
>>> I received some patches for openturns from J. Schueller.
>>>
>>> I will apply them and upload a new version for 0.15 then work
Le 22 avril 2012 20:31, D. Barbier a écrit :
> Le 22 avril 2012 20:19, Christophe Prud'homme a écrit :
>> Denis
>>
>> I received some patches for openturns from J. Schueller.
>>
>> I will apply them and upload a new version for 0.15 then work on 1.0
>
> Christophe, I already almost finished packa
Le 22 avril 2012 20:19, Christophe Prud'homme a écrit :
> Denis
>
> I received some patches for openturns from J. Schueller.
>
> I will apply them and upload a new version for 0.15 then work on 1.0
Christophe, I already almost finished packaging for 1.0, the only
issue is with python. But I do n
Denis
I received some patches for openturns from J. Schueller.
I will apply them and upload a new version for 0.15 then work on 1.0
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Package: python-openturns
> Version: 0.15-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
Package: python-openturns
Version: 0.15-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
It seems that python-openturns 0.15-3 is unusable:
$ python
Python 2.7.2+ (default, Jan 20 2012, 17:51:10)
[GCC 4.6.2] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for m
19 matches
Mail list logo
