Bug#669317: reconf-inetd does not handle comments correctly

Hi again, It would also be nice to document what services were actually added/removed in the log file. Thanks, Jon 2012-04-20 12:18:55,552 - skipping line with invalid number of fields: "# Internet superserver configuration database " 2012-04-20 12:18:55,553 - adding 2 new service(s) 2012-04-20 1

Bug#669317: reconf-inetd does not handle comments correctly

Package: reconf-inetd Hi Serafeim, I've changed the format of the reconf-inetd files and it is now working. I was going to suggest documenting the config file format in the man page, (especially given that it is quite easy to misread xinetd.conf as inetd.conf) but I see this has already been fi

Bug#669317: reconf-inetd does not handle comments correctly

retitle 669317 verbose mode should list invalid fragments severity 669317 minor thanks Hi again, The files you install under /usr/share/reconf-inetd are not valid xinetd.conf(5) fragments (instead they are in the inetd.conf format). For an example fragment, see lines 35-45 at http://anonscm.debi

Bug#669317: reconf-inetd does not handle comments correctly

Thanks for the report Jonathan. I'll check it out over the weekend. -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o

Bug#669317: reconf-inetd does not handle comments correctly

Package: reconf-inetd Version: 0.120226 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I am trying to convert my package to use reconf-inetd, but it silently fails. Verbose mode shows that reconf-inetd believes that the line below is a user commented inetd entry. # Internet superserver configuration datab