reassign 668589 xserver-xorg-core
forwarded 668589 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49170
kthxbye
On Don, 2012-04-26 at 14:59 +0200, Mariusz Bialonczyk wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 02:24 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > You should probably report this upstream at
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.or
On 04/26/2012 02:24 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> You should probably report this upstream at
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=xorg and let us know
> the upstream bug number.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49170
thank you
regards,
--
Mariusz BiaÅoÅczyk
jabber/e-m
On Don, 2012-04-26 at 13:33 +0200, Mariusz Bialonczyk wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 06:39 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > That's the closest to the crashing scenario so far. :) If you could
> > disable acceleration for nouveau instead of for radeon, that would be
> > even closer, but either way please run t
On Mit, 2012-04-25 at 18:05 +0200, Mariusz Bialonczyk wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 05:37 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Acceleration is enabled for both drivers. The test would be to disable
> > it for one (but only one) of them.
> I'm sorry. I've attached the log and config for the test before NoAccel.
>
On Mit, 2012-04-25 at 17:33 +0200, Mariusz Bialonczyk wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 05:09 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > The radeon + nouveau log file you posted earlier shows it enabled for
> > both of them. The test would be to disable it for one of them.
> I did this test. Results in attachment (no cras
On Mit, 2012-04-25 at 16:41 +0200, Mariusz Bialonczyk wrote:
> On 04/20/2012 01:33 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > The thing is, nouveau uses EXA as well, so it might just work by
> > accident. To rule that out, you could try disabling acceleration for
> > nouveau (if it allows that) or radeon (Optio
On 04/20/2012 01:33 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> The thing is, nouveau uses EXA as well, so it might just work by
> accident. To rule that out, you could try disabling acceleration for
> nouveau (if it allows that) or radeon (Option "NoAccel").
Bingo! :)
>From my observations it seems you was right
On Don, 2012-04-19 at 21:24 +0200, Mariusz Bialonczyk wrote:
> On 04/16/2012 05:40 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> I am wondering if it is possible because i am using xinerama on top
> >> of all my screens. See my config below, it's a little exotic.
> >
> > I'm not sure it's possible, but it's hard
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 17:16 +0200, Mariusz Bialonczyk wrote:
> On 04/16/2012 10:49 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Sam, 2012-04-14 at 09:52 +0200, Mariusz Bialonczyk wrote:
> >> Despite about 2 hours trying, I cannot reproduce it with radeon driver
> >> only.
> >
> > What if you use e.g. the v
On Sam, 2012-04-14 at 09:52 +0200, Mariusz Bialonczyk wrote:
> Despite about 2 hours trying, I cannot reproduce it with radeon driver only.
What if you use e.g. the vesa driver (one that doesn't use EXA) for the
nVidia card(s)?
> Anyway, I am attaching gdb backtraces (with nvidia driver loaded)
Hi,
Despite about 2 hours trying, I cannot reproduce it with radeon driver only.
Anyway, I am attaching gdb backtraces (with nvidia driver loaded):
bt:
#0 exaPixmapHasGpuCopy (pPixmap=0x7f834ae70cb0) at ../../exa/exa.c:249
#1 0x7f833eab22ed in exaPrepareAccessReg_mixed (pPixmap=0x7f834ae70cb
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:01:33 +0200, Mariusz Białończyk wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
> I have a crash of xserver when running psi instant messanger.
> It crashes differently: sometimes just after starting (when the contact list
> is
> drawn), and also after several minutes of using.
> When i am n
12 matches
Mail list logo
