retitle 667793 aptitude: FTBFS when trying to backport to squeeze
kthxbye
Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> > No, 0.6.6-1 is not in squeeze (not even in wheezy anymore), squeeze
> > has 0.6.3-3.2+squeeze1.
>
> Indeed, but the submitter appears to be trying to build 0.6.6 in
> squeeze anyway.
Ah, sorry, th
On 30 May 2012 12:21, Axel Beckert wrote:
>> #667793 refers to build problems in squeeze.
>
> No, 0.6.6-1 is not in squeeze (not even in wheezy anymore), squeeze
> has 0.6.3-3.2+squeeze1.
>
Indeed, but the submitter appears to be trying to build 0.6.6 in
squeeze anyway. From the original report:
tags 667793 - squeeze
kthxbye
Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> retitle 667793 aptitude: FTBFS in squeeze
> severity 667793 minor
> tags 667793 - patch
> tags 667793 + squeeze
> thanks
>
> On 30 May 2012 09:57, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > tags 667793 + patch
> > thanks
> >
> > adding -Wno-error=delete-non-v
user debian-...@lists.debian.org
usertags 667793 - ftbfs-gcc-4.7
usertags 672335 + ftbfs-gcc-4.7
thanks
On 30.05.2012 10:13, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> retitle 667793 aptitude: FTBFS in squeeze
> severity 667793 minor
> tags 667793 - patch
> tags 667793 + squeeze
> thanks
>
> On 30 May 2012 09:57, M
retitle 667793 aptitude: FTBFS in squeeze
severity 667793 minor
tags 667793 - patch
tags 667793 + squeeze
thanks
On 30 May 2012 09:57, Matthias Klose wrote:
> tags 667793 + patch
> thanks
>
> adding -Wno-error=delete-non-virtual-dtor avoids the new warning, but maybe
> you
> want to come up with
tags 667793 + patch
thanks
adding -Wno-error=delete-non-virtual-dtor avoids the new warning, but maybe you
want to come up with a better solution.
please let me know if the package can be NMU'ed later.
diff -Nru aptitude-0.6.7/debian/changelog aptitude-0.6.7/debian/changelog
--- aptitude-0.6.7/de
6 matches
Mail list logo
