Hi,
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> tags 666834 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi Thibaut,
>
> you will find attached below a patch porting your module to Apache2 2.4.
> Please test it and consider its inclusion. Note, I hardly tried more
> than compiling and loading the module. I didn'
tags 666834 + patch
thanks
Hi Thibaut,
you will find attached below a patch porting your module to Apache2 2.4.
Please test it and consider its inclusion. Note, I hardly tried more
than compiling and loading the module. I didn't test it in detail.
I've also fixed two problems while driving-by: Y
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05.05.2012 19:44, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
>> I don't get it: I thought Apache 2.4 wasn't scheduled for Wheezy?
>
> what makes you think that? We definitively want to have 2.4 in Wheezy.
> However, the final decision might come from the re
Hi,
On 05.05.2012 19:44, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> I don't get it: I thought Apache 2.4 wasn't scheduled for Wheezy?
what makes you think that? We definitively want to have 2.4 in Wheezy.
However, the final decision might come from the release team.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeep
I don't get it: I thought Apache 2.4 wasn't scheduled for Wheezy?
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 1:48 PM, wrote:
> tags 666834 '+upstream'
> thanks
> Dear maintainer,
>
> this is a follow-up message to your Apache 2.4 transition bug for
> package libapache-mod-musicindex. We are approaching an upload of
tags 666834 '+upstream'
thanks
Dear maintainer,
this is a follow-up message to your Apache 2.4 transition bug for
package libapache-mod-musicindex. We are approaching an upload of the web
server to
Debian's Unstable repository as soon as the release team acknowledges
the upload. Along that upload
6 matches
Mail list logo
