Hi,
On 06.07.2013 17:07, intrigeri wrote:
> Does this suit your time constraints?
yes, works for me. We should just aim to get Apache 2.4 into Testing
soonish to appease the Release Team and apparmor is amongst those
modules which cannot easily removed from Testing to force Apache in as
it is a n
Hi Arno,
Arno Töll wrote (06 Jul 2013 14:21:27 GMT) :
> any chance to move on with an upload anytime soon?
I'm nagging Kees to know how he wants to proceed.
If nothing convincing happens by Wednesday, I'll NMU with the debdiff
I've attached to message #54.
Does this suit your time constraints?
Hi,
> If needed, I might be able to help for the "upload at the right time"
> part, but I don't plan to learn how to use/test the AppArmor changehat
> Apache module any time soon, so this really should be done by
> someone else.
any chance to move on with an upload anytime soon? AppArmor has reve
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:41:31PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Given the remaining amount of work needed to get Debian some *basic*
> AppArmor support in time for Wheezy, I suggest we simply stop building
> the libapache2-mod-apparmor binary package for the time being,
> and focus our limited resourc
Hi,
a...@debian.org wrote (01 Apr 2012 21:15:51 GMT) :
> Usertags: apache24transition
Given the remaining amount of work needed to get Debian some *basic*
AppArmor support in time for Wheezy, I suggest we simply stop building
the libapache2-mod-apparmor binary package for the time being,
and focu
5 matches
Mail list logo
