Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Han Boetes
Your patch seems to fix the issue. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_variable#Definition.2C_declaration_and_the_extern_keyword # Han -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
tags 665974 patch upstream thanks Am Mittwoch, den 20.06.2012, 16:47 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: > 1) Could you check if it works with the latest SVN snapshot of libmpc: > svn co http://svn.musepack.net/libmpc > > 2) Could you provide an example sound file somewhere? I do not have > one myse

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 20.06.2012 11:07, schrieb Han Boetes: With "CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security" it fails and with "CFLAGS=-g -O2" it works fine indeed. 1) Could you check if it works with the latest SVN snapshot of libmpc: svn co http://svn.musepack.ne

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Han Boetes
With "CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security" it fails and with "CFLAGS=-g -O2" it works fine indeed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 20.06.2012 10:09, schrieb Han Boetes: Most certainly. With only the CFLAGS cleared the library still works, just like you suspected. So it seems to choke on the stack-protector... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Han Boetes
On 20-06-12 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 19.06.2012 17:57, schrieb Han Boetes: > Alright. Since I consider CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS quite harmless, could you > please leave them as they are and rebuild another time with only CFLAGS > reset to an empty string? Most certainly. With only the CFLAG

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 19.06.2012 17:57, schrieb Han Boetes: That is exactly the difference between a working and a non-working binary. You're on the right track. Alright. Since I consider CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS quite harmless, could you please leave them as they are and rebuild another time with only CFLAGS reset

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-19 Thread Han Boetes
That is exactly the difference between a working and a non-working binary. You're on the right track. I've repeated the buildprocess twice so that the only diffence is the proposed flag changes. # Han -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-19 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 13.06.2012 23:23, schrieb Han Boetes: So if there is a difference between the two packages it should be in this diff. [...] --- libmpc_0.1~r459-1/compat2010-05-31 16:25:23.0 +0200 +++ libmpc_0.1~r459-2/compat2012-02-14 23:27:59.0 +0100 @@ -1 +1 @@ -7 +9 This change

Bug#665974: Diff between the two libmpc_0.1~r459-X.debian.tar.gz files

2012-06-13 Thread Han Boetes
So if there is a difference between the two packages it should be in this diff. And when looking at it: the differences in libmpcdec6.install... Does it really mean the installed binaries are the ones found in /usr/lib rather than in the fake installation directory? diff -upwr libmpc_0.1~r459-1/

Bug#665974: moc: does not play .mpc files with 'Error in the stream!' message

2012-03-27 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
reassign 665974 libmpcdec6 2:0.1~r459-2 thanks * Thom [2012-03-28 09:08 +1100]: > Hi Elimar! > > > Could you please test like: > > mocp -O "PreferredDecoders+=mpc(ffmpeg)" file_name.mpc > > Works fine in this case for me. > > It seems that you are right about buggy libmpcdec6. > > I tried to

Bug#665974:

2012-03-27 Thread Thom
Hi Elimar! > Could you please test like: > mocp -O "PreferredDecoders+=mpc(ffmpeg)" file_name.mpc Works fine in this case for me. It seems that you are right about buggy libmpcdec6. I tried to use libmpcdec6_0.1~r459-1_i386 from 'squeeze' and all my .mpc files play without errors. Thanks for

Bug#665974: moc: does not play .mpc files with 'Error in the stream!' message

2012-03-27 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Thom [2012-03-28 00:44 +1100]: > Package: moc > Version: 1:2.5.0~alpha4+svn20120224-1 > Severity: normal > > $ file 'file_name.mpc' > file_name.mpc: Musepack audio, SV 7.0, quality 10 Hi Thom, I can reproduce :(. Could you please test like: mocp -O "PreferredDecoders+=mpc(ffmpeg)" file_name

Bug#665974: moc: does not play .mpc files with 'Error in the stream!' message

2012-03-27 Thread Thom
Package: moc Version: 1:2.5.0~alpha4+svn20120224-1 Severity: normal $ file 'file_name.mpc' file_name.mpc: Musepack audio, SV 7.0, quality 10 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-trunk-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8