Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> Hi Vasudev--
>
> On Sat 2016-07-30 03:17:01 -0400, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>
>> Do you still find this problem in latest fontforge in Debian
>> experimental?.. I did a quick search in fontforge/othersubrs.c file I
>> did not find exact license text you posted.
>
> I do
Hi Vasudev--
On Sat 2016-07-30 03:17:01 -0400, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> Do you still find this problem in latest fontforge in Debian
> experimental?.. I did a quick search in fontforge/othersubrs.c file I
> did not find exact license text you posted.
I don't see that license text either, but ther
Hi Dkg,
Do you still find this problem in latest fontforge in Debian
experimental?.. I did a quick search in fontforge/othersubrs.c file I
did not find exact license text you posted.
Since I became the new maintainer of fontforge, this bug popped up on my
Maintainer Dashboard :-). So wondering i
t for OpenType (AFDKO) is licensed under
Apache-2.0 license. Fontforge is licensed under GPL-3, so it's not a
problem to embedded it.
Thanks, Read and other folks in Adobe :)
Bug#665334 "non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge" is solved.
However, I don't know it is okay
Hi Read--
Thanks for the thoughtful and helpful followup! Comments below:
On 09/04/2012 11:33 AM, Read Roberts wrote:
> Given enough time, Adobe could publish the MM othersubr code under an
> OpenSource license. However, although the Adobe Type Dept could request
> this pretty quickly, it wo
Given enough time, Adobe could publish the MM othersubr code under an
OpenSource license. However, although the Adobe Type Dept could request this
pretty quickly, it would take many months to actually happen - the this will
sit at the bottom of the legal groups's priority list for a long time
On 07/13/2012 11:34 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>> We could probably make a new dfsg-free "clean" upstream tarball that is
>> still capable of building fontforge binaries by ripping out big chunks
>> of this file (i haven't tried it yet), but i don't know what that would
>> do to fontforge's abilit
Package: fontforge
Severity: serious
On 03/03/2012 07:48 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> We have a package libimager-perl where we have had to remove a few
> adobe-related test files as being non-DFSG. See
> http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/TONYC/Imager-0.88/adobe.txt .
>
> However given a comment in t
8 matches
Mail list logo
