Bug#665326: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#665326: confused by disapparance of octave-depends (nothing in changelog)

2012-03-30 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Rafael Laboissiere writes: > Let us revisit this issue. I am considering to reintroduce the > octave-depends script into the liboctave-dev package. This script was > formerly shipped with the octaveX.Y-headers package and was a handy way > of substituting ${octave:Depends} in debian/control, su

Bug#665326: confused by disapparance of octave-depends (nothing in changelog)

2012-03-30 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Sébastien Villemot [2012-03-23 10:32]: > Yaroslav Halchenko writes: > > > I had build-depends on octave-pkg-dev (which depended on octave3.2-headers) > > and > > used octave-depends to substitute octave:Depends . Now the package FTBFS in > > sid and it is not transparent where octave-depen

Bug#665326: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#665326: Bug#665326: confused by disapparance of octave-depends (nothing in changelog)

2012-03-27 Thread Sébastien Villemot
tags 665326 + pending thanks Yaroslav Halchenko writes: >> I would rather add a >> line to changelog.Debian: technically it belongs to the entry for the >> 3.4.3-1 version, but I am not sure it is acceptable to modify an old >> entry afterwards. > > I have done that on few occasions -- better la

Bug#665326: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#665326: Bug#665326: Bug#665326: confused by disapparance of octave-depends (nothing in changelog)

2012-03-23 Thread Thomas Weber
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:59:15AM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > I guess we removed it without notice because we were not aware that it > was used by packages maintained outside the Debian Octave Group. Yes, indeed. > Concerning where to put the removal notice: NEWS.Debian does not seem > a

Bug#665326: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#665326: Bug#665326: confused by disapparance of octave-depends (nothing in changelog)

2012-03-23 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > I may have missed something, but I don't know what "octave-depends" is. > Ok sorry I just realized that there was an octave-depends script in > octave3.2-headers (of which I was not aware because we rather use the DH > helper in octave-pkg-dev).

Bug#665326: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#665326: Bug#665326: confused by disapparance of octave-depends (nothing in changelog)

2012-03-23 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Sébastien Villemot writes: > Yaroslav Halchenko writes: > >> I had build-depends on octave-pkg-dev (which depended on octave3.2-headers) >> and >> used octave-depends to substitute octave:Depends . Now the package FTBFS in >> sid and it is not transparent where octave-depends are gone/what the

Bug#665326: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#665326: Bug#665326: confused by disapparance of octave-depends (nothing in changelog)

2012-03-23 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Sébastien Villemot writes: > Yaroslav Halchenko writes: > >> I had build-depends on octave-pkg-dev (which depended on octave3.2-headers) >> and >> used octave-depends to substitute octave:Depends . Now the package FTBFS in >> sid and it is not transparent where octave-depends are gone/what the

Bug#665326: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#665326: confused by disapparance of octave-depends (nothing in changelog)

2012-03-23 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Yaroslav Halchenko writes: > I had build-depends on octave-pkg-dev (which depended on octave3.2-headers) > and > used octave-depends to substitute octave:Depends . Now the package FTBFS in > sid and it is not transparent where octave-depends are gone/what they are > replaced with... > > I see >

Bug#665326: confused by disapparance of octave-depends (nothing in changelog)

2012-03-22 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Package: liboctave-dev Version: 3.6.1-4 Severity: minor I have a package (not yet in Debian, some licensing issues yet to resolve) which builds some .mex's: http://neuro.debian.net/pkgs/octave-psychtoolbox-3.html I had build-depends on octave-pkg-dev (which depended on octave3.2-headers) and use