Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On September 13, 2015 9:33:52 PM GMT-03:00, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >On Wednesday, September 09 2015, I wrote: > >> On Monday, August 24 2015, I wrote: >> >>> On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: >>> > Your work was done back in June, so if you prefer I can provide > patc

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Sunday, September 13 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: >> One (last?) update. >> >> I have upgrade/recreated the repository one more time now. Thadeu >> Cascardo pointed me to two lintian warnings that I had not seen before >> (they're fixed now), and I've cherry-picked Andreas's commits (those >>

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:33:52 -0400 Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Wednesday, September 09 2015, I wrote: > > > On Monday, August 24 2015, I wrote: > > > >> On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: > >> > Your work was done back in June, so if you prefer I can provide > patch

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Wednesday, September 09 2015, I wrote: > On Monday, August 24 2015, I wrote: > >> On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: >> Your work was done back in June, so if you prefer I can provide patches against your branch to implement/fix the issues I have been working on. It

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Monday, August 24 2015, I wrote: > On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: > >>> Your work was done back in June, so if you prefer I can provide >>> patches against your branch to implement/fix the issues I have been >>> working on. It won't really matter much, I think: in the end, we'

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: >> Your work was done back in June, so if you prefer I can provide >> patches against your branch to implement/fix the issues I have been >> working on. It won't really matter much, I think: in the end, we'll >> have to use the "official" repository

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 14:09:46 -0400 Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:39:08 -0400 > > Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > > >> On Saturday, August 08 2015, I wrote: > >> > >> >> I'll take a look at your branch once it's pub

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Friday, August 14 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:39:08 -0400 > Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > >> On Saturday, August 08 2015, I wrote: >> >> >> I'll take a look at your branch once it's published. >> > >> > Thanks. I have just published it: >> > >> >

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:39:08 -0400 Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Saturday, August 08 2015, I wrote: > > >> I'll take a look at your branch once it's published. > > > > Thanks. I have just published it: > > > > > > > > This is *not*

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On ven., 2015-08-14 at 02:39 -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Did you guys have time to look at my repository? I'm not right sure who you're asking exactly, but just to re-state this again: I don't want to be involved with Midori packaging anymore *at all*. You can safely drop me from those m

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Saturday, August 08 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: >> I saw your message only yesterday, sorry about that. As it turns >> out, I have also been working on getting Midori fixed. My intention >> is to maintain it; Thadeu Cascardo is going to help me take over the >> package. However, as you are al

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 15:39:54 -0400 Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Saturday, August 01 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: > > >> I'm interested in helping out with Midori packaging. I'm not sure > >> who's still interested in the package at this point (I know Corsac > >> isn't, so I didn't Cc him).

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Saturday, August 01 2015, Andres Salomon wrote: >> I'm interested in helping out with Midori packaging. I'm not sure >> who's still interested in the package at this point (I know Corsac >> isn't, so I didn't Cc him). I've created a git branch for the 0.5.10 >> release here: >> >> git://lung

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 05:17:01 -0700 Andres Salomon wrote: > Hi, > > I'm interested in helping out with Midori packaging. I'm not sure > who's still interested in the package at this point (I know Corsac > isn't, so I didn't Cc him). I've created a git branch for the 0.5.10 > release here: > >

Bug#663185: interested in (co-)maintaining midori

Hi, I'm interested in helping out with Midori packaging. I'm not sure who's still interested in the package at this point (I know Corsac isn't, so I didn't Cc him). I've created a git branch for the 0.5.10 release here: git://lunge.queued.net/git/midori http://lunge.queued.net/gitweb/?p=midori;

Bug#663185:

Hi all, I already created a package for the latest version on my local for-personal-use-only repo since months now. I'd like to share it but I didn't fully understand how to do it the debian way. The midori upstream changed the build system to cmake so the new package is simpler than before but f

Bug#663185: midori: would there be any problem if the new version would get packaged?

Dear bug subscribers, I am thinking about volunteering to package the current midori release for debian. Are there any generals objections to that from your side? Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Bug#663185: midori: New upstream version doesn't depend on waf anymore

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:06:16AM +0900, Koichi Akabe wrote: > Hi Developers, > > If you are not interested in this package, why don't you mark it as > RFA[1] or O[2]? Please notify it to other developers on the community. > I think you have to find a new maintainer. Because I disagree with the

Bug#663185: midori: New upstream version doesn't depend on waf anymore

16, 2014 at 04:36:34AM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote: > > Package: midori > > Version: 0.4.3+dfsg-0.1 > > Followup-For: Bug #663185 > > > > Hi there. > > > > Just for the record, upstream has changed midori's build system from waf to > > c

Bug#663185: midori: New upstream version doesn't depend on waf anymore

Hi all, Just wish they had considered that sooner (the change from waf to cmake, it is/was a sensible move, just hope it was sooner). Would have liked to see midori as an alternative browser but with the maintainer not upto it anymore seems it will soon be discarded. -- Regards,

Bug#663185: midori: New upstream version doesn't depend on waf anymore

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:36:34AM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote: > Package: midori > Version: 0.4.3+dfsg-0.1 > Followup-For: Bug #663185 > > Hi there. > > Just for the record, upstream has changed midori's build

Bug#663185: midori: New upstream version doesn't depend on waf anymore

Package: midori Version: 0.4.3+dfsg-0.1 Followup-For: Bug #663185 Hi there. Just for the record, upstream has changed midori's build system from waf to cmake: http://www.twotoasts.de/index.php/2013/11/two-webkittens/ Since some platforms (e.g., powerpc) don't have the luxury of h

Bug#663185: Any update with the waf packaging thing - upstream released 0.4.8 sometime ago.

On jeu., 2013-03-07 at 09:00 +0900, Koichi Akabe wrote: > I didn't know what you are no longer interested in, so I wished > helping > you to fix RC-bug. You are saying it now, so please submit to wnpp > to *make well known*. I was pissed off by the whole way this was handled, that's all. EOD. --

Bug#663185: Any update with the waf packaging thing - upstream released 0.4.8 sometime ago.

I didn't know what you are no longer interested in, so I wished helping you to fix RC-bug. You are saying it now, so please submit to wnpp to *make well known*. I don't have any wishes. Just for helping packaging. On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:33:48 +0100 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On jeu., 2013-03-07

Bug#663185: Any update with the waf packaging thing - upstream released 0.4.8 sometime ago.

On jeu., 2013-03-07 at 08:26 +0900, Koichi Akabe wrote: > I think Ryan is also no longer interested in this package, because he > has > never > sent any message for this thread. > I NMUed, but I don't wish to maintain this package perpetually. > I think you can submit orphaned. I could remove myse

Bug#663185: Any update with the waf packaging thing - upstream released 0.4.8 sometime ago.

I think Ryan is also no longer interested in this package, because he has never sent any message for this thread. I NMUed, but I don't wish to maintain this package perpetually. I think you can submit orphaned. 2013/03/07 8:07 "Yves-Alexis Perez" : > > On jeu., 2013-03-07 at 08:04 +0900, Koichi Ak

Bug#663185: Any update with the waf packaging thing - upstream released 0.4.8 sometime ago.

Hi Yves-Alexis, We have to find another maintainer for this package, so could you set this package to orphand? 2013/03/07 5:20 "Yves-Alexis Perez" : > On jeu., 2013-03-07 at 00:23 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > > Hi all, > > Upstream released 0.4.8 sometime ago. Please see > > > > http://mail.xfc

Bug#663185: Any update with the waf packaging thing - upstream released 0.4.8 sometime ago.

On jeu., 2013-03-07 at 00:23 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Hi all, > Upstream released 0.4.8 sometime ago. Please see > > http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce-announce/2013-February/000246.html > > Also http://www.twotoasts.de/index.php?/pages/midori_summary.html - I > am getting a 504 timeout ga

Bug#663185: Any update with the waf packaging thing - upstream released 0.4.8 sometime ago.

Hi all, Upstream released 0.4.8 sometime ago. Please see http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce-announce/2013-February/000246.html Also http://www.twotoasts.de/index.php?/pages/midori_summary.html - I am getting a 504 timeout gateway but Google's cache shared with me this :- http://twotoasts.de/i

Bug#645191: Bug#663185: midori 0.4.4 released (with support for webkitgtk 1.4.3)

On lun., 2012-12-31 at 11:01 +0100, Felix Zweig wrote: > On 03/09/2012 01:43 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > Thanks, I do follow upstream. Packaging is ready at > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/midori.git;a=summary > > > > Unfortunately, because of > > http://bugs.debian.org/c

Bug#663185: midori 0.4.4 released (with support for webkitgtk 1.4.3)

On 03/09/2012 01:43 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Thanks, I do follow upstream. Packaging is ready at > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/midori.git;a=summary > > Unfortunately, because of > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645191 and > http://lists.debian.org/debia

Bug#663185: midori 0.4.4 released (with support for webkitgtk 1.4.3)

On ven., 2012-03-09 at 18:38 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > at bottom :- > > Thank you for sharing that, I guess the best way would be to remove > midori then from a user perspective? Well, midori 0.4.3 does work fine. > > I ask because any changes you would have to make to the package would > i

Bug#663185: midori 0.4.4 released (with support for webkitgtk 1.4.3)

at bottom :- On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 18:13, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On ven., 2012-03-09 at 13:26 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> Package: midori >> Version: 0.4.3-1 >> Severity: wishlist >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> Midori released a new version 0.4.4 just few hours ago. Please see >> http://archiv

Bug#663185: midori 0.4.4 released (with support for webkitgtk 1.4.3)

On ven., 2012-03-09 at 13:26 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Package: midori > Version: 0.4.3-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > Midori released a new version 0.4.4 just few hours ago. Please see > http://archive.xfce.org/src/apps/midori/0.4/midori-0.4.4.tar.bz2#!sha1!ead09b6ceb9cadc4c227

Bug#663185: midori 0.4.4 released (with support for webkitgtk 1.4.3)

Package: midori Version: 0.4.3-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Midori released a new version 0.4.4 just few hours ago. Please see http://archive.xfce.org/src/apps/midori/0.4/midori-0.4.4.tar.bz2#!sha1!ead09b6ceb9cadc4c22761490cbf9914346b7ee0 and http://www.twotoasts.de/index.php?/archives/5